Comparison of a single-step with a multistep single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model for genomic evaluation of conformation traits in German Holsteins

被引:7
|
作者
Alkhoder, H. [1 ]
Liu, Z. [1 ]
Segelke, D. [1 ]
Reents, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] IT Solut Anim Prod Vit, Heinrich Schroeder Weg 1, D-27283 Verden, Germany
关键词
single-step model; single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased predictor model; conformation trait; dairy cattle; PEDIGREE; BIAS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2021-21145
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Genomic evaluation based on a single-step model uses all available data of phenotype, genotype, and pedigree; therefore, it should provide unbiased genomic breeding values with a higher correlation of prediction than the current multistep genomic model. Since 2019, a mixed reference population of cows and bulls has been applied to the routine multistep genomic evaluation in German Holsteins. For a fair comparison between the single-step and multistep genomic models, the same phenotype, genotype, and pedigree data were used. Because of its simple structure of the standard multitrait animal model used for German Holstein conventional evaluation, conformation traits were chosen as the first trait group to test a single-step SNP BLUP model for the large, genotyped population of German Holsteins. Genotype, phenotype, and pedigree data were taken from the official August 2020 conventional and genomic evaluation. Because of the same trait definition in national and multiple across-country evaluation for the conformation traits, deregressed multiple across country evaluation estimated breeding value (EBV) of foreign bulls were treated as a new source of data for the same trait in the genomic evaluations. Due to a short history of female genotyping in Germany, the last 3 yr of youngest cows and bulls were deleted, instead of 4 yr, to perform a genomic validation. In comparison to the multistep genomic model, the single-step SNP BLUP model resulted in a higher correlation and greater variance of genomic EBV according to 798 national validation bulls. The regression of genomic prediction of the current, full evaluation on the earlier, truncated evaluation was slightly closer to 1 than the multistep model. For the validation bulls or youngest genomic artificial insemination bulls, correlation of genomic EBV between the 2 models was, on average, 0.95 across all the conformation traits. We did not find overprediction of young animals by the single-step SNP BLUP model for the conformation traits in German Holsteins.
引用
收藏
页码:3306 / 3322
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes
    Fragomeni, B. O.
    Lourenco, D. A. L.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Masuda, Y.
    Aguilar, I.
    Legarra, A.
    Lawlor, T. J.
    Misztal, I.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (06) : 4090 - 4094
  • [22] Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models
    Stranden, I.
    Matilainen, K.
    Aamand, G. P.
    Mantysaari, E. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2017, 134 (03) : 264 - 274
  • [23] Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle
    Park, Mi Na
    Alam, Mahboob
    Kim, Sidong
    Park, Byoungho
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Sung Soo
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2020, 33 (10): : 1544 - 1557
  • [24] Application of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction with a multiple-lactation random regression test-day model for Japanese Holsteins
    Baba, Toshimi
    Gotoh, Yusaku
    Yamaguchi, Satoshi
    Nakagawa, Satoshi
    Abe, Hayato
    Masuda, Yutaka
    Kawahara, Takayoshi
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2017, 88 (08) : 1226 - 1231
  • [25] Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework
    Baller, Johnna L.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Kuehn, Larry A.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 (06)
  • [26] The impact of truncating data on the predictive ability for single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
    Howard, Jeremy T.
    Rathje, Tom A.
    Bruns, Caitlyn E.
    Wilson-Wells, Danielle F.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2018, 135 (04) : 251 - 262
  • [27] Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs
    Fragomeni, B. O.
    Lourenco, D. A. L.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Bradford, H. L.
    Gray, K. A.
    Huang, Y.
    Misztal, I.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (12) : 5004 - 5013
  • [28] Weighted Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Method Application for Assessing Pigs on Meat Productivity and Reproduction Traits
    Kabanov, Artem
    Melnikova, Ekaterina
    Nikitin, Sergey
    Somova, Maria
    Fomenko, Oleg
    Volkova, Valeria
    Kostyunina, Olga
    Karpushkina, Tatiana
    Martynova, Elena
    Trebunskikh, Elena
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (13):
  • [29] Accuracy of genomic evaluation with weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction for milk production traits, udder type traits, and somatic cell scores in French dairy goats
    Teissier, M.
    Larroque, H.
    Robert-Granie, C.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (04) : 3142 - 3154
  • [30] The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
    Howard, Jeremy T.
    Rathje, Tom A.
    Bruns, Caitlyn E.
    Wilson-Wells, Danielle F.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 (11) : 4532 - 4542