Factors supporting and inhibiting teachers' use of manipulatives around the primary to post-primary education transition

被引:1
作者
Johnson, Patrick [1 ]
O'Meara, Niamh [2 ]
Leavy, Aisling [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Sch Educ, Room D2-036,Main Bldg, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Univ Limerick, Sch Educ, EPISTEM, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Mary Immaculate Coll, Dept STEM Educ, Limerick, Ireland
关键词
Manipulatives; mathematics education; transition; teacher education; SECONDARY-SCHOOL TRANSITION; MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION; CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; ELEMENTARY; BELIEFS; PUPILS;
D O I
10.1080/0020739X.2020.1736348
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper offers insight into teachers' perspectives on the role of manipulatives in the mathematics classroom on either side of the primary to post-primary transition (sixth class teachers in Irish primary schools and first year mathematics teachers in post-primary schools) to examine if discontinuities exist around their usage. The transition from primary to post-primary education is considered the most difficult of all educational transitions that students face, with negative effects more pronounced in the subject of mathematics. A questionnaire involving several open-ended questions was distributed to teachers teaching students in the final year of primary school and teachers teaching mathematics to students in the first year of post-primary education. Results of the qualitative data analysis reveal insights into teachers' perceptions of the benefits, supports and obstacles to manipulative use. It reveals that, in general, teachers on either side of the boundary crossing are in agreement regarding the perceived benefits of using manipulatives and also the potential factors that inhibit their usage. On the other hand, their opinions regarding the factors that support the use of manipulatives are more divergent.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1028
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
ADLER J, 2011, TEXT LIVED RESOURCES, P3
[2]  
Ambrose R.C., 2002, Teaching Children Mathematics, V9, P16
[3]  
Anderson L.W., 2000, INT J EDUC RES, V33, P325, DOI [10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00020-3, DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00020-3]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ED GLANCE 2018 OECD, DOI [10.1787/eag-2018-en, DOI 10.1787/EAG-2018-EN]
[5]  
Attard C., 2010, Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), P53
[6]   Content Knowledge for Teaching What Makes It Special? [J].
Ball, Deborah Loewenberg ;
Thames, Mark Hoover ;
Phelps, Geoffrey .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2008, 59 (05) :389-407
[8]  
Baroody A.J., 1989, ARITH TEACH, V36, P4
[9]  
Benavot A., 2004, A Global Study of Intended Instructional Time and Official School Curricula, 1980-2000
[10]   Looking for Attributes of Powerful Teaching for Numeracy in Tasmanian K-7 Classrooms [J].
Beswick, Kim ;
Swabey, Karen ;
Andrew, Rob .
MATHEMATICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2008, 20 (01) :3-31