Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis

被引:121
作者
Adams, Judith E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm, MAHSC, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Radiol, Royal Infirm, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; MINERAL DENSITY; VERTEBRAL FRACTURES; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; IN-VIVO; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; HEALTHY-CHILDREN; PROXIMAL FEMUR;
D O I
10.1038/nrendo.2012.217
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The diagnosis and management of osteoporosis have been improved by the development of new quantitative methods of skeletal assessment and by the availability of an increasing number of therapeutic options, respectively. A number of imaging methods exist and all have advantages and disadvantages. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely available and commonly utilized method for clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis and will remain so for the foreseeable future. The WHO 10-year fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX (R)) will improve clinical use of DXA and the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic intervention. Improved reporting of radiographic features that suggest osteoporosis and the presence of vertebral fracture, which are powerful predictors of future fractures, could increase the frequency of appropriate DXA referrals. Quantitative CT remains predominantly a research tool, but has advantages over DXA-allowing measurement of volumetric density, separate measures of cortical and trabecular bone density, and evaluation of bone shape and size. High resolution imaging, using both CT and MRI, has been introduced to measure trabecular and cortical bone microstructure. Although these methods provide detailed insights into the effects of disease and therapies on bone, they are technically challenging and not widely available, so they are unlikely to be used in clinical practice. Adams, J. E. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 9, 28-42 (2013); doi:10.1038/nrendo.2012.217
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 42
页数:15
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]  
Adams J. E., 2009, DUAL ENERGY XRAY ABS, P152
[2]   Radiogrammetry and Radiographic Absorptiometry [J].
Adams, Judith E. .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 48 (03) :531-+
[3]   Quantitative computed tomography [J].
Adams, Judith E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 71 (03) :415-424
[4]   OBSERVER ERROR AND MEASUREMENTS OF METACARPAL [J].
ADAMS, P ;
DAVIES, GT ;
SWEETNAM, PM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1969, 42 (495) :192-&
[5]   Radiology of Osteoporosis [J].
Anil, Gopinathan ;
Guglielmi, Giuseppe ;
Peh, Wilfred C. G. .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 48 (03) :497-+
[6]   A reference database for the Stratec XCT-2000 peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scanner in healthy children and young adults aged 6-19 years [J].
Ashby, R. L. ;
Ward, K. A. ;
Roberts, S. A. ;
Edwards, L. ;
Mughal, M. Z. ;
Adams, J. E. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 20 (08) :1337-1346
[7]   Digital X-ray radiogrammetry identifies women at risk of osteoporotic fracture: Results from a prospective study [J].
Bach-Mortensen, P. ;
Hyldstrup, L. ;
Appleyard, M. ;
Hindso, K. ;
Gebuhr, P. ;
Sonne-Holm, S. .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 79 (01) :1-6
[8]  
Bachrach Laura K, 2005, Pediatr Endocrinol Rev, V2 Suppl 3, P332
[9]  
Baim S, 2008, J CLIN DENSITOM, V11, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.002
[10]  
BARNETT E, 1960, Clin Radiol, V11, P166, DOI 10.1016/S0009-9260(60)80012-8