Some numerical properties of approaches to physics-dynamics coupling for NWP

被引:18
作者
Dubal, M [1 ]
Wood, N [1 ]
Staniforth, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
numerical analysis; parallel-split coupling; physics parametrizations; predictor-corrector; sequential-split coupling;
D O I
10.1256/qj.05.49
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
At the present time there exist a number of different approaches to the problem of coupling parametrized physical processes to the dynamical core in operational numerical weather-prediction (NWP) and climate models. Motivated by the various strategies in use, some idealized representative coupling schemes are constructed and subsequently analysed using a methodology in which the physics and dynamics terms are represented in a simplified way. Particular numerical properties of the idealized schemes which are of interest are the ability to capture correct steady-state solutions and to be second-order accurate in time. In general, the schemes require specific choices for the time-differencing of certain coupled processes if correct steady-state solutions are to be obtained. This has implications for the overall numerical stability of a coupling strategy. An alternative physics-dynamics coupling approach is then described and analysed. A multiple-sweep predictor-corrector coupling scheme is shown to capture the correct steady-state solution and to allow for second-order accuracy, provided that the convective process is coupled explicitly. This approach has a number of advantages over those currently used in operational NWP models.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 42
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Beljaars A., 2004, P ECMWF SEM REC DEV, P113
[2]  
Caya A, 1998, MON WEATHER REV, V126, P1707, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1707:COUTSM>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Cordero E, 2005, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V131, P93, DOI [10.1256/qj.04/34, 10.1256/qj.04.34]
[5]   On the use of a predictor-corrector scheme to couple the dynamics with the physical parametrizations in the ECMWF model [J].
Cullen, MJP ;
Salmond, DJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 129 (589) :1217-1236
[6]  
Cullen MJP, 2001, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V127, P2787, DOI 10.1002/qj.49712757814
[7]  
Dubal M, 2004, MON WEATHER REV, V132, P121, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)131<0121:AOPVSS>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
KALNAY E, 1988, MON WEATHER REV, V116, P1945, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1988)116<1945:TSFSND>2.0.CO
[10]  
2