Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples

被引:7
|
作者
Srirungruang, Siriporn [1 ,2 ]
Mahajindawong, Buraya [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Nimitpanya, Panachai [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Bunkasem, Uthaitip [1 ,6 ]
Ayuyoe, Pattama [1 ,2 ]
Nuchprayoon, Surang [1 ,6 ]
Sanprasert, Vivornpun [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Lymphat Filariasis & Trop Med Res Unit, Chulalongkorn Med Res Ctr Chula MRC, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Dept Parasitol, Thai Red Cross Soc, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Dermatol, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[4] King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Thai Red Cross Soc, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[5] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[6] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Dept Parasitol, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词
DNA extraction; bead-beating procedure; stool samples; intestinal parasites; polymerase chain reaction; PCR inhibitor; EGGS; KITS; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12112588
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Stool samples typically contain PCR inhibitors; however, helminths are difficult to lyse and can cause false-negative PCR results. We assessed the effective methods for extracting DNA from different kinds of intestinal parasites. We compared the most common DNA extraction methods from stool samples, including the phenol-chloroform technique with or without a bead-beating step (P and PB), a QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Q), and a QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (QB). Genomic DNA was extracted from 85 stool samples collected from patients infected with Blastocystis sp., Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, hookworm, and Strongyloides stercoralis. DNA quantity and DNA quality were evaluated via spectrophotometry, and DNA integrity was assessed by PCR. We found that P and PB provided higher DNA yields (similar to 4 times) than when using Q and QB. However, P showed the lowest detection rate of PCR (8.2%), wherein only S. stercoralis (7 out of 20 samples) was detected. QB showed the highest detection rate of PCR (61.2%). After plasmid spikes, only 5 samples by QB were negative while 60 samples by P were still negative. Remarkably, QB could extract DNA from all the groups of parasites that we tested. These results indicate that QB is the most effective DNA extraction method for the diagnosis and monitoring of intestinal parasites via PCR.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DNA extraction protocol for rapid PCR detection of pathogenic bacteria
    Brewster, Jeffrey D.
    Paoli, George C.
    ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 442 (01) : 107 - 109
  • [32] Comparison and Optimization of DNA Extraction Methods for Human DNA from Dried Blood Spot Samples
    Van Biesen, Natalja
    Cools, Piet
    Meyers, Eline
    PEDIATRIC REPORTS, 2025, 17 (02):
  • [33] Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods using stool, blood, and nasopharyngeal swab samples
    Oloo, Marceline Adhiambo
    Awandu, Shehu Shagari
    Onyango, Benson
    Magwanga, Richard Odongo
    Oluoch, Alfred Ochieng
    Lidechi, Shirley
    Muok, Erick Mbata
    Munga, Stephen
    Estambale, Benson
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 46
  • [34] Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods from Saliva as a Source of PCR - Amplifiable Genomic DNA
    Solomon, Sorina Mihaela
    Matei, Madalina Nicoleta
    Badescu, Aida Corina
    Jelihovschi, Igor
    Martu-Stefanache, Alexandra
    Teusan, Anca
    Martu, Silvia
    Iancu, Luminita Smaranda
    REVISTA DE CHIMIE, 2015, 66 (12): : 2101 - 2103
  • [35] Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for PCR detection of fungal and bacterial contamination in cocoa extracts
    Marta Tortajada
    Pedro Vicente Martínez-Culebras
    Verónica Navarro
    Honorato Monzó
    Daniel Ramón
    European Food Research and Technology, 2009, 230 : 79 - 87
  • [36] Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for PCR detection of fungal and bacterial contamination in cocoa extracts
    Tortajada, Marta
    Vicente Martinez-Culebras, Pedro
    Navarro, Veronica
    Monzo, Honorato
    Ramon, Daniel
    EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 230 (01) : 79 - 87
  • [37] International Study to Evaluate PCR Methods for Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in Blood Samples from Chagas Disease Patients
    Schijman, Alejandro G.
    Bisio, Margarita
    Orellana, Liliana
    Sued, Mariela
    Duffy, Tomas
    Mejia Jaramillo, Ana M.
    Cura, Carolina
    Auter, Frederic
    Veron, Vincent
    Qvarnstrom, Yvonne
    Deborggraeve, Stijn
    Hijar, Gisely
    Zulantay, Ines
    Horacio Lucero, Raul
    Velazquez, Elsa
    Tellez, Tatiana
    Sanchez Leon, Zunilda
    Galvao, Lucia
    Nolder, Debbie
    Monje Rumi, Maria
    Levi, Jose E.
    Ramirez, Juan D.
    Zorrilla, Pilar
    Flores, Maria
    Jercic, Maria I.
    Crisante, Gladys
    Anez, Nestor
    De Castro, Ana M.
    Gonzalez, Clara I.
    Viana, Karla Acosta
    Yachelini, Pedro
    Torrico, Faustino
    Robello, Carlos
    Diosque, Patricio
    Triana Chavez, Omar
    Aznar, Christine
    Russomando, Graciela
    Buscher, Philippe
    Assal, Azzedine
    Guhl, Felipe
    Sosa Estani, Sergio
    DaSilva, Alexandre
    Britto, Constanca
    Luquetti, Alejandro
    Ladzins, Janis
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2011, 5 (01):
  • [38] Evaluation of genomic DNA extraction methods for the identification of Leptospira spp. in bovine urine samples by PCR
    Revelo R, Alexandra
    De La Torre M, Euclides
    Martinez C, Galo
    Baquero C, Maria
    Casart Q, Yveth
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACIONES VETERINARIAS DEL PERU, 2020, 31 (02):
  • [39] Evaluation of the Efficacy of Five DNA Extraction Methods for the Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in Direct and Processed Sputum by an In-House PCR Method
    Tarhan, Guelnur
    Ceyhan, Ismail
    Simsek, Huelya
    Tuncer, Serdar
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 39 (02) : 253 - 257
  • [40] RNA extraction for molecular detection of Newcastle disease virus - comparative study of three methods
    Dimitrov, K.
    Clavijo, A.
    Sneed, L.
    REVUE DE MEDECINE VETERINAIRE, 2014, 165 (5-6) : 172 - 175