Should a vehicle fuel economy standard be combined with an economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions constraint? Implications for energy and climate policy in the United States

被引:35
作者
Karplus, Valerie J. [1 ]
Paltsev, Sergey [1 ]
Babiker, Mustafa [1 ]
Reilly, John M. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT Joint Program Sci & Policy Global Change, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
Fuel economy standard; Climate policy; Vehicles; CGE modeling;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The United States has adopted fuel economy standards that require increases in the on-road efficiency of new passenger vehicles, with the goal of reducing petroleum use and (more recently) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Understanding the cost and effectiveness of fuel economy standards, alone and in combination with economy-wide policies that constrain GHG emissions, is essential to inform coordinated design of future climate and energy policy. We use a computable general equilibrium model, the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model, to investigate the effect of combining a fuel economy standard with an economy-wide GHG emissions constraint in the United States. First, a fuel economy standard is shown to be at least six to fourteen times less cost effective than a price instrument (fuel tax) when targeting an identical reduction in cumulative gasoline use. Second, when combined with a cap-and-trade (CAT) policy, a binding fuel economy standard increases the cost of meeting the GHG emissions constraint by forcing expensive reductions in passenger vehicle gasoline use, displacing more cost-effective abatement opportunities. Third, the impact of adding a fuel economy standard to the CAT policy depends on the availability and cost of abatement opportunities in transport if advanced biofuels provide a cost-competitive, low carbon alternative to gasoline, the fuel economy standard does not bind and the use of low carbon fuels in passenger vehicles makes a significantly larger contribution to GHG emissions abatement relative to the case when biofuels are not available. This analysis underscores the potentially large costs of a fuel economy standard relative to alternative policies aimed at reducing petroleum use and GHG emissions. It further emphasizes the need to consider sensitivity to vehicle technology and alternative fuel availability and costs as well as economy-wide responses when forecasting the energy, environmental, and economic outcomes of policy combinations. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 333
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, INV US GREENH GAS EM
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, 22 INT BATT HYBR FUE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, World Energy Outlook 2010
  • [4] Bandivadekar A., 2008, ROAD 2035 REDUCING T
  • [5] BEA [Bureau of Economic Analysis], 2012, NAT INC PROD ACC PER
  • [6] Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments
    Bennear, Lori Snyder
    Stavins, Robert N.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 37 (01) : 111 - 129
  • [7] Bohringer Christoph, 2009, CESIFO WORKING PAPER, V2837
  • [8] Cheah L., 2010, COST VEHICLE ELECT L
  • [9] Davis S.C., 2011, Transportation energy data book : Edition 30
  • [10] Interactions between measures for the support of electricity from renewable energy sources and CO2 mitigation
    De Jonghe, Cedric
    Delarue, Erik
    Belmans, Ronnie
    D'haeseleer, William
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (11) : 4743 - 4752