Does a Discussion by Any Other Name Sound the Same? Teaching Discussion in Three ELA Methods Courses

被引:25
作者
Alston, Chandra L. [1 ]
Danielson, Katie A. [2 ]
Dutro, Elizabeth [3 ]
Cartun, Ashley [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Educ, 610 E Univ Ave,Room 4045, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Teaching & Learning, Steinhardt Sch, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Educ, Literacy Studies, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Elementary Field Experiences, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
literacy; reading teacher education; practice-based teacher education; elementary teacher education; secondary teacher education; CORE PRACTICES; TEACHERS; STUDENTS; INSTRUCTION; DISCUSSIONS; ENGAGEMENT; DISCOURSE; EDUCATION; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1177/0022487117715227
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Facilitating discussions in English Language Arts can develop students' skills as speakers and listeners and their ability to engage with diverse perspectives. However, classroom observations often demonstrate a lack of student talk, raising questions about the complexity of facilitating discussion and teachers' opportunities to learn and hone the practice. In this article, we discuss how teacher educators leveraged a collaboratively designed specification of the practice of facilitating discussions to attempt some alignment across three programs. The teacher educators reached what we call alignment amid variation. There was consistency in the stances regarding the role of children in classrooms and understanding of the purposes for and key aspects of the practice that allowed for alignment amid variation in their work with novice teachers across programs. Our findings have implications for considering the work of cross-institutional collaborations to improve teacher preparation and K-12 student learning.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 238
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]  
Loewenberg Ball D., 2009, Journal of Teacher Education, P497
[42]   Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice [J].
Lyle, Sue .
LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2008, 22 (03) :222-240
[43]  
McDonald M., 2013, ANN M AM ASS COLL TE
[44]   Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education: A Call for a Common Language and Collective Activity [J].
McDonald, Morva ;
Kazemi, Elham ;
Kavanagh, Sarah Schneider .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2013, 64 (05) :378-386
[45]  
Merriam S. B., 2015, QUALITATIVE RES GUID, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[46]  
NYSTRAND M, 1991, RES TEACH ENGL, V25, P261
[47]  
Nystrand M., 1997, OPENING DIALOGUE UND, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2307/417942, DOI 10.2307/417942]
[48]   IN THE AGE OF ANALYTIC READING Understanding Readers' Engagement With Text [J].
Pennell, Colleen .
READING TEACHER, 2014, 68 (04) :251-260
[49]   Power and Agency in Education: Exploring the Pedagogical Dimensions of Funds of Knowledge [J].
Rodriguez, Gloria M. .
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION, VOL 37: EXTRAORDINARY PEDAGOGIES FOR WORKING WITHIN SCHOOL SETTINGS SERVING NONDOMINANT STUDENTS, 2013, 37 :87-120
[50]  
Schwab JJ., 1978, Science, curriculum, and liberal education, P167