Investigating the limits of multifunctional agriculture as the dominant frame for Green Care in agriculture in Flanders and the Netherlands

被引:53
作者
Dessein, Joost [1 ,2 ]
Bock, Bettina B. [3 ]
de Krom, Michiel P. M. M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Agr & Fisheries Res ILVO, Social Sci Unit, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Dept Agr Econ, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Wageningen Univ, Rural Sociol Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Sociol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Social farming; Green Care; Multifunctional agriculture; Rural development; Frames; RURAL-DEVELOPMENT; REFLECTIONS; PLACES; FARMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.011
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
European agriculture and rural areas are facing multiple socio-economic changes, including a transition from an agriculture-based to a service-based economy. This restructuring forces agricultural and rural actor-networks to reformulate their (self-)definitions. One reformulation prevailing both in policy and scientific circles focuses on the notion of multifunctional agriculture (MFA). This paper critically examines the dominant role that this notion has played in legitimising and shaping the pathways of rural development now present in Europe. More specifically, we examine MFA's role in promoting and organising Green Care as an innovative agricultural activity in the Netherlands and in Flanders (Belgium). We will demonstrate that the MFA frame does not sufficiently grasp the complex reality of Green Care developments. More importantly, the dominance of the MFA frame and related practices and institutional structures enable as well as constrain Green Care's continuity and further development. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 59
页数:10
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, DOI DOI 10.1063/1.3033202
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Mental Health and Social exclusion
[3]   Forests, discourses, institutions A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance [J].
Arts, Bas ;
Buizer, Marleen .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 11 (5-6) :340-347
[4]  
Bachrach L.L., 1996, Mental Health Service Evaluation
[5]  
Barnes M., 2008, FARMING HLTH
[6]  
Bauduin D., 2002, GOOD CARE COMMUNITY
[7]  
Berget B.B., 2008, International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, V29, P323
[8]  
Bevir M., 2006, Interpretation and method : Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn, P281
[9]  
Bock B.B, 2010, EC GREEN CARE AGR CO
[10]   Fitting in and multi-tasking: Dutch farm women's strategies in rural entrepreneurship [J].
Bock, BB .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2004, 44 (03) :245-+