Life-Cycle Assessment of Electric Power Systems

被引：87

作者：

Masanet, Eric ^{[1
]}

Chang, Yuan ^{[1
]}

Gopal, Anand R. ^{[2
]}

Larsen, Peter ^{[2
,3
]}

Morrow, William R., III ^{[2
]}

Sathre, Roger ^{[2
]}

Shehabi, Arman ^{[2
]}

Zhai, Pei ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Northwestern Univ, McCormick Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA

[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Environm Energy Technol Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA

[3] Stanford Univ, Management Sci & Engn Dept, Stanford, CA 94305 USA

来源：

ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 38 | 2013年 / 38卷

关键词：

environmental analysis; life-cycle inventory; life-cycle impact; energy policy; electricity; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; POSTCOMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE; GEOTHERMAL-ENERGY; RENEWABLE ENERGY; LAND-USE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; WIND TURBINES; GENERATION; IMPACT; PV;

D O I：

10.1146/annurev-environ-010710-100408

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

The application of life-cycle assessment (LCA) to electric power (EP) technologies is a vibrant research pursuit that is likely to continue as the world seeks ways to meet growing electricity demand with reduced environmental and human health impacts. Although LCA is an evolving methodology with a number of barriers and challenges to its effective use, LCA studies to date have improved our understanding of the lifecycle energy, greenhouse gas emissions, air pollutant emissions, and water-use implications of EP technologies. With continued progress, LCA offers promise for assessing and comparing EP technologies in an analytically thorough and environmentally holistic manner for more robust deployment decisions. This article summarizes (a) current challenges in applying LCA to EP technologies, (b) LCA results to date on various impacts of EP technologies, and (c) opportunities for improving LCAs of EP technologies.

引用

页码：107 / 136

页数：30

共 172 条

[91] Review of criteria for evaluating LCA weighting methods [J].

Johnsen, Fredrik Moltu ;

Lokke, Soren .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (04) :840-849

[92] Methodologies for social life cycle assessment [J].

Jorgensen, Andreas ;

Le Bocq, Agathe ;

Nazarkina, Liudmila ;

Hauschild, Michael .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (02) :96-103

[93]

Kandt A, 2011, NRELTP7A4051297

[94] Approaches for performing uncertainty analysis in large-scale energy/economic policy models [J].

Kann, A ;

Weyant, JP .

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2000, 5 (01) :29-46

[95]

Kershaw P., 1999, PILOT STUDY UPDATE M

[96]

Kesminas Vytautas, 2008, Ekologija, V54, P124

[97] Energy [R]evolution 2008-a sustainable world energy perspective [J].

Krewitt, Wolfram ;

Teske, Sven ;

Simon, Sonja ;

Pregger, Thomas ;

Graus, Wina ;

Blomen, Eliane ;

Schmid, Stephan ;

Schafer, Oliver .

ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) :5764-5775

[98] Role of renewable energy in climate mitigation: a synthesis of recent scenarios [J].

Krey, Volker ;

Clarke, Leon .

CLIMATE POLICY, 2011, 11 (04) :1131-1158

[99] Environmental aspects of geothermal energy utilization [J].

Kristmannsdóttir, H ;

Armannsson, H .

GEOTHERMICS, 2003, 32 (4-6) :451-461

[100] Acid rain in China [J].

Larssen, T ;

Lydersen, E ;

Tang, DG ;

He, Y ;

Gao, JX ;

Liu, HY ;

Duan, L ;

Seip, HM ;

Vogt, RD ;

Mulder, J ;

Shao, M ;

Wang, YH ;

Shang, H ;

Zhang, XS ;

Solberg, S ;

Aas, W ;

Okland, T ;

Eilertsen, O ;

Angell, V ;

Liu, QR ;

Zhao, DW ;

Xiang, RJ ;

Xiao, JS ;

Luo, JH .

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (02) :418-425

← 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 →