Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?

被引:12
作者
Budin-Ljosne, Isabelle [1 ]
Soye, Kaitlin J. [2 ]
Tasse, Anne Marie [2 ]
Knoppers, Bartha Maria [2 ]
Harris, Jennifer R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Genes & Environm, Div Epidemiol, NO-0403 Oslo, Norway
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A4, Canada
来源
BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS | 2013年 / 6卷
关键词
Genotype-Driven Recruitment; Feedback of results; Genetic testing; Biobanks; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENOMIC RESEARCH; PARTICIPANTS; PERSPECTIVES; DISCLOSURE; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1186/1755-8794-6-19
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Genotype-Driven Recruitment (GDR) is a research design that recruits research participants based on genotype rather than based on the presence or absence of a particular condition or clinical outcome. Analyses of the ethical issues of GDR studies, and the recommendations derived from these analyses, are based on GDR research designs that make use of genetic information already collected in previous studies. However, as genotyping becomes more affordable, it is expected that genotypic information will become a common part of the information stored in biobanks and held in health care records. Furthermore, individuals will increasingly gain knowledge of their own genotypes through Direct-to-Consumer services. One can therefore foresee that individuals will be invited to participate not only in follow-up GDR studies but also in original GDR studies because genetic information about them is available. These individuals may or may have not participated in research before and may or may not be aware that their genetic information is available for research. Discussion: From a conceptual point of view, we investigate whether the current ethics-related recommendations for the conduct of GDR suffice for a broader array of circumstances under which genetic information can be available. Our analysis reveals that the existing recommendations do not suffice for a broader use of GDR. Summary: Our findings refocus attention on ethical issues which are neither new nor specific to GDR but which place greater demand on coordinated solutions. These challenges and approaches for addressing them are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] Obasogie OK, GOOGLING YOUR GENES
  • [32] Exploring the ELSI Universe: critical issues in the evolution of human genomic research
    Oliver, Jill M.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    [J]. GENOME MEDICINE, 2011, 3
  • [33] Disclosing individual results of clinical research - Implications of respect for participants
    Shalowitz, DI
    Miller, FG
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (06): : 737 - 740
  • [34] Shanks P, NEW BUSINESS PLANS D
  • [35] PARENT PERSPECTIVES ON PEDIATRIC GENETIC RESEARCH AND IMPLICATIONS FOR GENOTYPE-DRIVEN RESEARCH RECRUITMENT
    Tabor, Holly K.
    Brazg, Tracy
    Crouch, Julia
    Namey, Emily E.
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Beskow, Laura M.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2011, 6 (04) : 41 - 52
  • [36] Vorhaus D, WHAT 5 FDA LETT MEAN
  • [37] Vorhaus D, WHAT HAPPENS DTC GEN
  • [38] Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Crock, Brittney N.
    Van Ness, Brian
    Lawrenz, Frances
    Kahn, Jeffrey P.
    Beskow, Laura M.
    Cho, Mildred K.
    Christman, Michael F.
    Green, Robert C.
    Hall, Ralph
    Illes, Judy
    Keane, Moira
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    Koenig, Barbara A.
    Kohane, Isaac S.
    LeRoy, Bonnie
    Maschke, Karen J.
    McGeveran, William
    Ossorio, Pilar
    Parker, Lisa S.
    Petersen, Gloria M.
    Richardson, Henry S.
    Scott, Joan A.
    Terry, Sharon F.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    Wolf, Wendy A.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) : 361 - 384