Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?

被引:12
作者
Budin-Ljosne, Isabelle [1 ]
Soye, Kaitlin J. [2 ]
Tasse, Anne Marie [2 ]
Knoppers, Bartha Maria [2 ]
Harris, Jennifer R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Genes & Environm, Div Epidemiol, NO-0403 Oslo, Norway
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A4, Canada
来源
BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS | 2013年 / 6卷
关键词
Genotype-Driven Recruitment; Feedback of results; Genetic testing; Biobanks; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENOMIC RESEARCH; PARTICIPANTS; PERSPECTIVES; DISCLOSURE; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1186/1755-8794-6-19
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Genotype-Driven Recruitment (GDR) is a research design that recruits research participants based on genotype rather than based on the presence or absence of a particular condition or clinical outcome. Analyses of the ethical issues of GDR studies, and the recommendations derived from these analyses, are based on GDR research designs that make use of genetic information already collected in previous studies. However, as genotyping becomes more affordable, it is expected that genotypic information will become a common part of the information stored in biobanks and held in health care records. Furthermore, individuals will increasingly gain knowledge of their own genotypes through Direct-to-Consumer services. One can therefore foresee that individuals will be invited to participate not only in follow-up GDR studies but also in original GDR studies because genetic information about them is available. These individuals may or may have not participated in research before and may or may not be aware that their genetic information is available for research. Discussion: From a conceptual point of view, we investigate whether the current ethics-related recommendations for the conduct of GDR suffice for a broader array of circumstances under which genetic information can be available. Our analysis reveals that the existing recommendations do not suffice for a broader use of GDR. Summary: Our findings refocus attention on ethical issues which are neither new nor specific to GDR but which place greater demand on coordinated solutions. These challenges and approaches for addressing them are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [11] Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: Consensus statement
    Caulfield, Timothy
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Cho, Mildred
    Buchanan, Janet A.
    Burgess, Michael M.
    Danilczyk, Ursula
    Diaz, Christina M.
    Fryer-Edwards, Kelly
    Green, Shane K.
    Hodosh, Marc A.
    Juengst, Eric T.
    Kaye, Jane
    Kedes, Laurence
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Lemmens, Trudo
    Meslin, Eric M.
    Murphy, Juli
    Nussbaum, Robert L.
    Otlowski, Margaret
    Pullman, Daryl
    Ray, Peter N.
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    Timmons, Michael
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (03): : 430 - 435
  • [12] Disclosing Individual CDKN2A Research Results to Melanoma Survivors: Interest, Impact, and Demands on Researchers
    Christensen, Kurt D.
    Roberts, J. Scott
    Shalowitz, David I.
    Everett, Jessica N.
    Kim, Scott Y. H.
    Raskin, Leon
    Gruber, Stephen B.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (03) : 522 - 529
  • [13] Doward J, PLANS NHS DATABASE P
  • [14] Thresholds and boundaries in the disclosure of individual genetic research results
    Dressler, Lynn G.
    Juengst, Eric T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2006, 6 (06) : 18 - 20
  • [15] Evans JP, 2008, GENET MED, V10, P500, DOI [10.1097/GIM.0b013e31817f280a, 10.1097GIM.0b013e31817f280a]
  • [16] Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants Updated Guidelines From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group
    Fabsitz, Richard R.
    McGuire, Amy
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Puggal, Mona
    Beskow, Laura M.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    Bookman, Ebony
    Burke, Wylie
    Burchard, Esteban Gonzalez
    Church, George
    Clayton, Ellen Wright
    Eckfeldt, John H.
    Fernandez, Conrad V.
    Fisher, Rebecca
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Gabriel, Stacey
    Gachupin, Francine
    James, Cynthia
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Kittles, Rick
    Leib, Jennifer R.
    O'Donnell, Christopher
    O'Rourke, P. Pearl
    Rodriguez, Laura Lyman
    Schully, Sheri D.
    Shuldiner, Alan R.
    Sze, Rebecca K. F.
    Thakuria, Joseph V.
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Burke, Gregory L.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR GENETICS, 2010, 3 (06) : 574 - 580
  • [17] Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results
    Fernandez, Conrad V.
    Weijer, Charles
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2006, 6 (06) : 44 - 46
  • [18] Disclosure of APOE Genotype for Risk of Alzheimer's Disease
    Green, Robert C.
    Roberts, J. Scott
    Cupples, L. Adrienne
    Relkin, Norman R.
    Whitehouse, Peter J.
    Brown, Tamsen
    Eckert, Susan LaRusse
    Butson, Melissa
    Sadovnick, A. Dessa
    Quaid, Kimberly A.
    Chen, Clara
    Cook-Deegan, Robert
    Farrer, Lindsay A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (03) : 245 - 254
  • [19] Health Law Institute University of Alberta, AN PRIV POL PRACT DI
  • [20] What Research Ethics Should Learn from Genomics and Society Research: Lessons from the ELSI Congress of 2011
    Henderson, Gail E.
    Juengst, Eric T.
    King, Nancy M. P.
    Kuczynski, Kristine
    Michie, Marsha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2012, 40 (04) : 1008 - 1024