Seismic performance assessment of different fibers reinforced concrete columns using incremental dynamic analysis

被引:34
作者
Pang, Yutao [1 ]
Cai, Li [1 ]
Ouyang, Hui [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaoyong [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Fac Engn, Lumo Rd 388, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Fiber-reinforced concrete; Bridge columns; Incremental dynamic analysis; Nonlinear static analyses; Seismic performance; Ground motions; CONFINED CONCRETE; STEEL; BEHAVIOR; STRENGTH; VULNERABILITY; BRIDGES; BARS;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.087
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Different fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) has been widely used in the recent decades, which can improve the mechanical behavior and dynamic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) columns remarkably. This paper aims to compare the seismic behavior of columns constructed with different FRC material, namely steel fibers reinforced concrete (SFRC), polypropylene fibers reinforced concrete (PFRC) and steel-polypropylene hybrid fiber reinforced concrete (HySPFRC). 3-D nonlinear finite element models have been built to represent the seismic behavior of different FRC columns, which are calibrated with the available experimental results of quasi-static tests. The seismic capacity of bridge columns with different FRC material are assessed based on four flexural damage states through the nonlinear static pushover analysis, such as a) yielding of longitudinal steels; b) core concrete crushing; c) buckling and d) fracture of longitudinal of steels. Incremental dynamic analyses (IDA) are conducted using the selected suite of 20 near-fault as-recorded ground motions to evaluate the inelastic seismic responses of different bridge columns. IDA curves are generated based on the intensity measure, namely peak ground acceleration (PGA) in this paper and seismic demands (i.e. maximum drift, residual drift, displacement ductility and curvature ductility) through nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis. It can be concluded from the IDA results that the SFRC, PFRC and HySPFRC are all effective to enhance the seismic performance, thus reducing the anticipated damage of the bridge columns. Moreover, SFRC and HySPFRC are more effective to improve the seismic capacity of bridge columns for the slight and moderate damage states, while PFRC and HySPFRC are more effective at the extensive and complete damage states. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 257
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
American Concrete Institute (ACI), 1982, 1R82 ACI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 31805 AM CONCR I
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, TB02012008 JTG
[4]   Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis [J].
Baker, Jack W. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) :579-599
[5]  
Berry MP, 2007, 200707 PEER U CAL RE
[6]   Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Multi-Span Continuous Highway Bridge Fitted with Shape Memory Alloy Bars and Laminated Rubber Bearings [J].
Bhuiyan, M. A. Rahman ;
Alam, M. Shahria .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2012, 28 (04) :1379-1404
[7]   Seismic Fragility Assessment of Concrete Bridge Pier Reinforced with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy [J].
Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir ;
Alam, M. Shahria .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (03) :1515-1541
[8]  
Chang G.A., 1994, NCEER Tech. Rep. No. NCEER-94-0006, P222
[9]  
Chao S.H., 2010, ANTOINE NAAMAN S 4 D, P151
[10]   Experimental Study on Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Subjected to Uniaxial Compression [J].
Chi, Yin ;
Xu, Lihua ;
Zhang, Yuanyuan .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 26 (02) :211-218