Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the hospital-level consumer assessment of health plans survey® instrument

被引:42
作者
Arah, OA
ten Asbroek, AHA
Delnoij, DMJ
de Koning, JS
Stam, PJA
Poll, AH
Vriens, B
Schmidt, PF
Klazinga, NS
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Social Med, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Ctr Prevent & Hlth Serv Res, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Agis Hlth Insurance Co, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CAHPS (R); hosptials; Dutch health care; patient experiences fo care; cross-cultural translation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00462.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives. To assess the reliability and validity of a translated version of the American Hospital-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (R) (H-CAHPS) instrument for use in Dutch health care. Data Sources/Study Setting. Primary survey data from adults aged 18 years or more who were recently discharged from two multispecialty city hospitals in the Netherlands. Study Design. We used forward and backward translation procedures and a panel of experts to adapt the 66-item pilot H-CAHPS into a 70-item Dutch instrument. Descriptive statistics and standard psychometric methods were then used to test the reliability and validity of the new instrument. Data Collection. From late November 2003 to early January 2004, the survey was administered by mail to 1,996 patients discharged within the previous 2 months. Principal Findings. Analyses supported the reliability and validity of the following 7-factor H-CAHPS structure for use in Dutch hospitals: on doctor's communication, nurses' communication, discharge information, communication about medication, pain control, physical environment of hospital, and nursing services. The internal consistency reliability of the scales ranged from 0.60 to 0.88. Items related to "family receiving help when on visit,""hospital staff introducing self," and "admission delays" did not improve the psychometric properties of the new instrument. Conclusions. These findings suggest that the H-CAHPS instrument is reliable and valid for use in the Dutch context. However, more research will be needed to support its equivalence to the United States version, and its use for between-hospital comparisons.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 301
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abramowitz S, 1987, QRB Qual Rev Bull, V13, P122
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Health measurement scales
[3]   Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement [J].
Arah, OA ;
Klazinga, NS ;
Delnoij, DMJ ;
Ten Asbroek, AHA ;
Custers, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 15 (05) :377-398
[4]  
*CAHPS 2 INV AG HE, 2003, HCAHPS 3 STAT PIL ST
[5]  
*CAHPS SURV US NET, 2004, CAHPS CONNECTION, V1, P2
[6]  
*CAHPS SURV US NET, 2004, INTRO CAHPS
[7]   A PATIENT SURVEY SYSTEM TO MEASURE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT - QUESTIONNAIRE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY [J].
CAREY, RG ;
SEIBERT, JH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1993, 31 (09) :834-845
[8]  
Cleary P D, 1992, QRB Qual Rev Bull, V18, P53
[9]   The increasing importance of patient surveys [J].
Cleary, PD .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212) :720-721
[10]   Health care quality - Incorporating consumer perspectives [J].
Cleary, PD ;
EdgmanLevitan, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (19) :1608-1612