How do we assign ourselves social status? A cross-cultural test of the cognitive averaging principle

被引:27
作者
Andersson, Matthew A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
关键词
Social status; SES; Cognition; Culture; United States; Japan; SUBJECTIVE SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; SELF-RATED HEALTH; UNITED-STATES; INCOME INEQUALITY; ASSOCIATION; AGE; DETERMINANTS; INDIVIDUALS; PERSPECTIVE; HAPPINESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.009
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Subjective social status (SSS), or one's. perceived social standing, is linked robustly to mental and physical health and is thought to be determined in part by a cognitive average of one's past, present and expected socioeconomic status. However, this averaging principle awaits a formal test. Further, cultures differ with regard to how they perceive and discount time. In this study, I draw upon cross-sectional data from the United States and Japan (2005 MIDUS non-Hispanic whites and 2008 MIDJA), which measured subjective status in terms of one's perceived standing within a personally defined community. I compare equal and unequal cognitive averaging models for their goodness of fit relative to a traditional present-based model. Socioeconomic status is assessed broadly, in terms of past, present and expected overall work and financial situations. In the United States, averaging models do not fit the data consistently better than a present-based model of SSS. However, in Japan, averaging models do fit SSS consistently better. These fit conclusions are robust to controlling for negative affect. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 329
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Social status and health: A comparison of British civil servants in Whitehall-II with European- and African-Americans in CARDIA [J].
Adler, Nancy ;
Singh-Manoux, Archana ;
Schwartz, Joseph ;
Stewart, Judith ;
Matthews, Karen ;
Marmot, Michael G. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 66 (05) :1034-1045
[2]   Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women [J].
Adler, NE ;
Epel, ES ;
Castellazzo, G ;
Ickovics, JR .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (06) :586-592
[3]   The Lower Subjective Social Status of Neurotic Individuals: Multiple Pathways Through Occupational Prestige, Income, and Illness [J].
Alfonsi, Giuseppe ;
Conway, Michael ;
Pushkar, Dolores .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2011, 79 (03) :619-642
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-306-48247-21
[5]   The endogenous determination of time preference [J].
Becker, GS ;
Mulligan, CB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (03) :729-758
[6]   Socioeconomic status in health research - One size does not fit all [J].
Braveman, PA ;
Cubbin, C ;
Egerter, S ;
Chideya, S ;
Marchi, KS ;
Metzler, M ;
Posner, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (22) :2879-2888
[7]   Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility [J].
Breen, R ;
Jonsson, JO .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 31 :223-243
[8]   School-work systems in postindustrial societies: Evidence from Japan [J].
Brinton, Mary C. ;
Tang, Zun .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND MOBILITY, 2010, 28 (02) :215-232
[9]   Cultural and community determinants of subjective social status among Cherokee and White youth [J].
Brown, Ryan A. ;
Adler, Nancy E. ;
Worthman, Carol M. ;
Copeland, William E. ;
Costello, E. Jane ;
Angold, Adrian .
ETHNICITY & HEALTH, 2008, 13 (04) :289-303
[10]   Are one man's rags another man's riches? Identifying adaptive expectations using panel data [J].
Burchardt, T .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2005, 74 (01) :57-102