Ultrasound for Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women: Results From a Population-Based Cancer Screening Program in China

被引:19
作者
Wang, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Hongda [2 ,3 ]
Li, Ni [2 ,3 ]
Ren, Jiansong [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Kai [2 ,4 ]
Dai, Min [2 ,3 ]
He, Jie [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Ultrasound,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Natl Canc Ctr, Off Canc Screening,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Canc Prevent, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Dept Thorac Surg, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
ultrasound; early diagnosis; breast cancer; cancer screening; risk prediction; MAMMOGRAPHY; VALIDATION; DENSITY; PREDICTION; DIAGNOSIS; MODELS; US;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2019.00286
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Ultrasound is an important modality for breast cancer screening. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of ultrasound screening in population-based cancer screening program in lacking. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of ultrasound screening in a population-based breast cancer screening in China. Methods: The analyses were conducted in the context of the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China, which recruited 1,938,996 eligible participants aged 40-69 years from 16 provinces in China from 2012 to 2016. We included 72,250 women assessed to be high-risk for breast cancer who undertook ultrasound screening per study protocol. Diagnostic yield according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) was evaluated. Risk factors associated with the positive findings of ultrasound were also explored by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: Overall, there were 9,765 (13.51%) women had positive findings of ultrasound screening, including 8,487 (11.75%), 1,210 (1.67%), and 68 (0.09%) of BI-RADS categories of III, IV, and V, respectively. Younger ages, late age of 1st live birth and short-term breast feeding were found to be positively associated with positive findings under ultrasound in multivariate analyses stratified by menopause status and family history of breast cancer. Multivariable prediction models were constructed and yielded only modest prediction accuracy, with AUCs around 0.55. Conclusions: We found the diagnostic yield of ultrasound screening for breast cancer in high-risk population was satisfactory. Prediction models based on environmental risk factors had limited prediction accuracy and need to be improved in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]  
Nelson H.D., 2016, Screening for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
[12]  
Omidiji Olubukola At, 2017, Ghana Med J, V51, P6, DOI 10.4314/gmj.v51i1.2
[13]   Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention [J].
Rockhill, B ;
Spiegelman, D ;
Byrne, C ;
Hunter, DJ ;
Colditz, GA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (05) :358-366
[14]   A multi-centre randomised trial comparing ultrasound vs mammography for screening breast cancer in high-risk Chinese women [J].
Shen, S. ;
Zhou, Y. ;
Xu, Y. ;
Zhang, B. ;
Duan, X. ;
Huang, R. ;
Li, B. ;
Shi, Y. ;
Shao, Z. ;
Liao, H. ;
Jiang, J. ;
Shen, N. ;
Zhang, J. ;
Yu, C. ;
Jiang, H. ;
Li, S. ;
Han, S. ;
Ma, J. ;
Sun, Q. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 (06) :998-1004
[15]   Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Siu, Albert L. ;
Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten ;
Grossman, David C. ;
Baumann, Linda Ciofu ;
Davidson, Karina W. ;
Ebell, Mark ;
Garcia, Francisco A. R. ;
Gillman, Matthew ;
Herzstein, Jessica ;
Kemper, Alex R. ;
Krist, Alex H. ;
Kurth, Ann E. ;
Owens, Douglas K. ;
Phillips, William R. ;
Phipps, Maureen G. ;
Pignone, Michael P. ;
LeFevre, Michael .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 164 (04) :279-+
[16]   Prevalence of Mammographically Dense Breasts in the United States [J].
Sprague, Brian L. ;
Gangnon, Ronald E. ;
Burt, Veronica ;
Trentham-Dietz, Amy ;
Hampton, John M. ;
Wellman, Robert D. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla ;
Miglioretti, Diana L. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (10)
[17]   Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old [J].
Stomper, PC ;
DSouza, DJ ;
DiNitto, PA ;
Arredondo, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 167 (05) :1261-1265
[18]   The Role of Ultrasound in Screening Dense Breasts-A Review of the Literature and Practical Solutions for Implementation [J].
Thigpen, Denise ;
Kappler, Amanda ;
Brem, Rachel .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 8 (01)
[19]   Validation of the online prediction tool PREDICT v. 2.0 in the Dutch breast cancer population [J].
van Maaren, M. C. ;
van Steenbeek, C. D. ;
Pharoah, P. D. P. ;
Witteveen, A. ;
Sonke, G. S. ;
Strobbe, L. J. A. ;
Poortmans, P. M. P. ;
Siesling, S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 86 :364-372
[20]   Effects of Age, Breast Density and Volume on Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Retrospective Comparison of Sensitivity of Mammography and Ultrasonography in China's Rural Areas [J].
Wang, Feng-Liang ;
Chen, Fei ;
Yin, Hong ;
Xu, Nan ;
Wu, Xiao-Xiang ;
Ma, Jing-Jing ;
Gao, Shen ;
Tang, Jin-Hai ;
Lu, Cheng .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (04) :2277-2282