The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis -: Radiographic evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants

A total of 410 hips were randomized to treatment with either a Charnley (206 hips) or a Spectron (204 hips) total hip arthroplasty. The patients were operated on by a standardized procedure using a contemporary cementing technique and were followed after 1, 3, 5 to 6, and 10 years. The postoperative radiographs showed a significantly increased rate of malalignment and consequently low grade of cement mantle quality of the Charnley stem compared to the Spectron. No differences concerning cement mantle quality or positioning were found between the Charnley ogee cup and the metal-backed Spectron. Evaluation of the follow-up radiographs revealed 10 loose Charnley stems and I loose Spectron stem and 4 loose Charnley ogee cups and 23 loose Spectron metal-backed cups. The differences of revision rate for the femoral and acetabular components of the 2 prostheses were significant (P = .03, Charnley femoral component more frequent: P = .03, Spectron acetabular component more frequent). The radiographic evaluation strengthened this disparity Poor wear characteristics of the metal-backed Spectron cup are perhaps the main reason for the highly significant difference in mechanical failure rate between the 2 cups. We therefore propose that metal-backing of cemented cups should be avoided, at least when combined with larger femoral heads. The difficulty in positioning the Charnley stem with an adequate cement mantle, especially in the absence of trochanteric ostectomy, might explain the inferior Charnley stem longevity in this study.