Dosimetric effects on the penumbra region of irregular multi-leaf collimated fields

被引:7
作者
Chow, JCL
Wettlaufer, B
Jiang, RQ
机构
[1] Grand River Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Grand River Reg Canc Ctr, Kitchener, ON N2G 1G3, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Phys, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/51/3/N01
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The dosimetric effect in the penumbra region for multi-leaf collimator (MLC) fields WEIS Studied using a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator. The beam profiles in the cross-line and in-line directions for MLC field configurations of varying lengths of protruded leaves, which are adjacent (oil one or both sides) to the beam profile axes, were measured using a 6 MV photon beam. It was found that there is,I decrease of dose in the 'edge' region of the protruded leaves' side in the cross-line profile, when the protruded leaves (upper and/or lower side) were moved out from 0.5 cm to 3 cm towards the central beam axis. When both the upper and lower portions of leaves were moved Out forming a gap for the profile, the dose at the 'edge' region in the cross-line direction was decreased by about 20% and 6%, with the protruded length of leaves being 0.5 cm and 1 cm, respectively. The penumbra width of the cross-line profile increased with the protruded length of leaves when the gap width WEIS 0.5 cm, and it WEIS independent of the length when the width was increased larger than I cm. The Pinnacle treatment planning system could calculate the decrease of dose observed experimentally in the cross-line profile, but an underestimation of about 30% was found when using version 6.2b, which did not consider the leaf rounded end and tongue-and-groove effect. While the newly commissioned 7.4f, which considered the two aforementioned effects, made an improvement, it still underestimated the dose by 25% compared to the measurement. For the in-line profiles, both versions estimated the penumbra width well.
引用
收藏
页码:N31 / N38
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The use of film dosimetry of the penumbra region to improve the accuracy of intensity modulated radiotherapy [J].
Arnfield, MR ;
Otto, K ;
Aroumougame, VR ;
Alkins, RD .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (01) :12-18
[2]   A method for determining multileaf collimator transmission and scatter for dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy [J].
Arnfield, MR ;
Siebers, JV ;
Kim, JO ;
Wu, QW ;
Keall, PJ ;
Mohan, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (10) :2231-2241
[3]   A variable fluence step clustering and segmentation algorithm for step and shoot IMRT [J].
Bär, W ;
Alber, M ;
Nüsslin, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (07) :1997-2007
[4]  
Boyer A., 2001, 50 AAPM RAD THER COM
[5]   Geometric analysis of light-field position of a multileaf collimator with curved ends [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Li, SD .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (05) :757-762
[6]   Dosimetric effect of collimating jaws for small multileaf collimated fields [J].
Chow, JCL ;
Seguin, M ;
Alexander, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (03) :759-765
[7]   Beam characteristics of a retrofitted double-focused multileaf collimator [J].
Das, IJ ;
Desobry, GE ;
McNeeley, SW ;
Cheng, EC ;
Schultheiss, TE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (09) :1676-1684
[8]   Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee [J].
Ezzell, GA ;
Galvin, JM ;
Low, D ;
Palta, JR ;
Rosen, I ;
Sharpe, MB ;
Xia, P ;
Xiao, Y ;
Xing, L ;
Yu, CX .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) :2089-2115
[9]   EVALUATION OF MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR DESIGN FOR A PHOTON-BEAM [J].
GALVIN, JM ;
SMITH, AR ;
MOELLER, RD ;
GOODMAN, RL ;
POWLIS, WD ;
RUBENSTEIN, J ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
MICHAEL, B ;
NEEDHAM, M ;
HUNTZINGER, CJ ;
KLIGERMAN, MM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1992, 23 (04) :789-801
[10]   The volume effect of detectors in the dosimetry of small fields used in IMRT [J].
Laub, WU ;
Wong, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (03) :341-347