Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking

被引:113
作者
Hayes, John E. [1 ,2 ]
Duffy, Valerie B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Coll Agr & Nat Resources, Dept Allied Hlth Sci, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Coll Agr & Nat Resources, Dept Nutr Sci, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
sweet; creamy; taste; genetics; response surface model; hedonics; food preferences; dietary fats; dietary carbohydrates; fungiform papillae; propylthiouracil; quinine; bitter;
D O I
10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.023
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A half-century ago, Fischer and colleagues found correlations between food preference and genetic markers of taste [6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), quinine]. Recently, a number of studies report differences in sweet liking/disliking with taste phenotype or genotype. Here we modeled optimal liking for milk/sugar mixtures using the response surface method among 79 mostly normal weight adults (36 women) who reported low dietary restraint. Two non-overlapping phenotype analyses were performed: a) discordance in PROP versus quinine bitterness and b) number of fungiform papillae (FP, taste papillae on the tongue tip). Although all phenotype groups liked highly sweet and creamy sensations (in liking by sensation models), the fat and sugar levels for hedonic optima varied (in liking by concentration models). Males generally liked higher fat (20 to 40%) and sugar levels, with females disliking unsweetened cream. In quinine/PROP groups, liking peaked at 30% fat/15% sucrose for men and women who tasted 0.32 mM quinine more bitter than 3.2 mM PROP (n = 15); a group previously shown to have highest sugar intakes (Duffy et al., 2003). Those tasting PROP more bitter than quinine (n = 14) reported greater creamy/sweet sensations, with peak liking at lower fat and sweet levels (3.3% fat/10% sucrose). Generally, those in the high FP group perceived more creamy/sweet sensations with level of liking more influenced by sugar level, especially among high FP females. At high sugar/high fat levels low FP males and females retained this liking while liking fell off for those in the high FP group. In summary, although most liked sweet/creamy sensations, perceptual differences in these sensations varied with oral phenotype, explaining some of the differences in the amount of sugar and fat required to reach hedonic optima. A high affinity for high sugar/high fat mixtures among oral phenotype subgroups has relevance for energy consumption and could explain the link previously observed between oral sensation and body weight. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 87
页数:11
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GENETIC VARIATIONS T
[2]   Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives [J].
Bartoshuk, Linda M. ;
Duffy, Valerie B. ;
Hayes, John E. ;
Moskowitz, Howard R. ;
Snyder, Derek J. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 361 (1471) :1137-1148
[3]   Labeled scales (eg, category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste [J].
Bartoshuk, LM ;
Duffy, VB ;
Fast, K ;
Green, BG ;
Prutkin, J ;
Snyder, DJ .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (02) :125-138
[4]   Supertasting, earaches and head injury: Genetics and pathology alter our taste worlds [J].
Bartoshuk, LM ;
Duffy, VB ;
Reed, D ;
Williams, A .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 1996, 20 (01) :79-87
[5]   PTC/PROP TASTING - ANATOMY, PSYCHOPHYSICS, AND SEX EFFECTS [J].
BARTOSHUK, LM ;
DUFFY, VB ;
MILLER, IJ .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 56 (06) :1165-1171
[6]   Taste damage: Previously unsuspected consequences [J].
Bartoshuk, LM ;
Snyder, DJ ;
Grushka, M ;
Berger, AM ;
Duffy, VB ;
Kveton, JF .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 2005, 30 :I218-i219
[7]   Differences in our sensory - Invalid comparisons with labeled scales [J].
Bartoshuk, LM ;
Fast, K ;
Snyder, DJ .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (03) :122-125
[8]   Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching [J].
Bartoshuk, LM ;
Duffy, V ;
Green, BG ;
Hoffman, HJ ;
Ko, CW ;
Lucchina, LA ;
Marks, LE ;
Snyder, DJ ;
Weiffenbach, JM .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2004, 82 (01) :109-114
[9]  
Beebe-Center J. G., 1932, PSYCHOL PLEASANTNESS
[10]  
Blundell JE, 2000, BRIT J NUTR, V83, pS33