Is bank risk appetite relevant to bank default in times of Covid-19?

被引:11
作者
Lee, Pei-Ling [1 ,3 ]
Lye, Chun-Teck [1 ]
Lee, Chin [2 ]
机构
[1] Multimedia Univ, Fac Business, Cyberjaya, Malaysia
[2] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Econ & Management, Serdang, Malaysia
[3] Univ Reading Malaysia, Henley Business Sch, Nusajaya, Malaysia
关键词
Bank risk appetite; Risk-taking; Default; Merton; ESG; COVID-19; NON-PERFORMING LOANS; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cbrev.2022.08.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper aims to analyze the effect of bank risk appetite on banks' default probabilities during the year of COVID-19 in 12 countries while controlling for bank-specific and country-specific effects over time. A System Generalized Methods of Moments (GMM) model of default probabilities is estimated over the periods 2010-2021. This study confirms the 'risk-mitigation view', in which banks with higher ESG scores are more prudent in lending and have better relationship management, reducing the probability of bank default. Underperforming banks tend to have a higher portion of risky loans in their credit portfolio and therefore demonstrating a higher default propensity. Bank risk appetite, ESG, asset quality, economic growth, and currency depreciation appear to be material drivers for bank risk. We find that a lower risk appetite ratio (corresponding to higher risk appetite) is associated with higher estimated default probability during the COVID-19 outbreak, identified through interaction with a single time dummy for 2020 (the break-out year of the pandemic). (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Central Bank of The Republic of Turkey.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 117
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]  
Otasevic D., 2013, 27 NAT BANK SERB
[42]   Institutional investor horizon and bank risk-taking [J].
Pathan, Shams ;
Haq, Mamiza ;
Faff, Robert ;
Seymour, Trent .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 66
[43]   How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata [J].
Roodman, David .
STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (01) :86-136
[44]  
Salami A.A, 2018, ACTA U DANUB OECON, V14, P522
[45]   Drivers of solvency risk - Are microfinance institutions different? [J].
Schulte, Markus ;
Winkler, Adalbert .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2019, 106 :403-426
[46]   Bank risks and lending outcomes: Evidence from QE q [J].
Sclip, Alex ;
Girardone, Claudia ;
Beltrame, Federico ;
Paltrinieri, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2021, 118
[47]  
Swamy V., 2012, International Journal of Banking and Finance, V9, P27
[48]   Corporate governance and default risk in financial firms over the post-financial crisis period: International evidence [J].
Switzer, Lorne N. ;
Tu, Qiao ;
Wang, Jun .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2018, 52 :196-210
[49]   Investor protection, regulation and bank risk-taking behavior [J].
Teixeira, Joao C. A. ;
Matos, Tiago F. A. ;
da Costa, Gui L. P. ;
Fortuna, Mario J. A. .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 51
[50]   Dividends and financial health: Evidence from US bank holding companies [J].
Tripathy, Niranjan ;
Wu, Da ;
Zheng, Yi .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 66