Participatory AI: Reducing AI Bias and Developing Socially Responsible AI in Smart Cities

被引:16
作者
Falco, Gregory [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Cyber Policy Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
2019 22ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (IEEE CSE 2019) AND 17TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING (IEEE EUC 2019) | 2019年
关键词
Responsible AI; AI Bias; Participatory Planning; Blockchain; Smart Cities;
D O I
10.1109/CSE/EUC.2019.00038
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
As smart cities evolve, artificial intelligence (AI) will increasingly be used to manage decisions for how cities operate. For everything from incarceration sentencing, city pension appropriation, surveillance and infrastructure management, AI will play a role. The author argues that implementing AI for a smart city should be decided similarly to how cities decide on major infrastructural planning projects. For both, there are social and ethical implications of deployment. A protocol is proposed for smart city AI so that AI can be seen as an ethical and trustworthy city asset rather than an adversary fraught with controversy and bias. This is achieved through participatory AI - the marriage of a fully transparent data architecture, such as the blockchain, and the urban planning practice of participatory planning. The diversity of opinions that participatory AI affords enables cities to facilitate socially responsible AI outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 164
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Blumberg B., 1997, Creating Personalities for Synthetic Actors. Towards Autonomous Personality Agents, P74, DOI 10.1007/BFb0030571
[2]   CROWDSOURCING THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS FOR PLANNING PROJECTS [J].
Brabham, Daren C. .
PLANNING THEORY, 2009, 8 (03) :242-262
[3]  
Collins Robert T, 2000, VSAM Final Rep, P1
[4]  
Doyle J., 1992, Computational Intelligence, V8, P376, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00371.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8640.1992.TB00371.X]
[5]  
Ferguson Andrew, 2017, TIME MAGAZINE
[6]   Learning from Practice in the Face of Conflict and Integrating Technical Expertise with Participatory Planning: Critical Commentaries on the Practice of Planner-Architect Laurence Sherman [J].
Forester, John .
PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2011, 12 (02) :287-288
[7]  
Forester John, 1999, The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes
[8]  
Hao K., 2019, MIT Technology ReviewJune 6,
[9]  
Hill, 2017, HYDE PARK HERALD
[10]  
Kalenka S., 1999, Cognition, agency and rationality, P135