Quantitative synthesis on the ecosystem services of cover crops

被引:276
作者
Daryanto, Stefani [1 ]
Fu, Bojie [1 ]
Wang, Lixin [2 ]
Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre [2 ]
Zhao, Wenwu [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, 19 XinJieKouWai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] IUPUI, Dept Earth Sci, 723 W Michigan St SL 118, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Agriculture; Climate change; Conservation farming; Soil health; Sustainability; SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; CORN YIELD RESPONSE; NO-TILL; CROPPING SYSTEMS; ORGANIC-CARBON; IMPROVING SOIL; MINERAL NITROGEN; DISEASE SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.06.013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The maintenance of soil health in agro-ecosystems is essential for sustaining agricultural productivity. Through its positive impacts on various soil physical and biological processes, cover cropping can be an important component of sustainable agricultural production systems. However, the practice of cover cropping can be complex, and possible trade-offs between the benefits and side effects of cover crops have not been examined. To evaluate these benefits and potential trade-offs, we quantitatively synthesized different ecosystem services provided by cover crops (e.g., erosion control, water quality regulation, soil moisture retention, accumulation of soil organic matter and microbial biomass, greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, weed and pest control, as well as yield of the subsequent cash crop) using data from previous publications. We used a simple indicator (8), defined as the ratio of an observed variable (i.e., ecosystem service) under cover crop and under fallow condition, to evaluate the impacts of cover crops on a given ecosystem service. Our results showed that cover crops provided beneficial ecosystem services in most cases, except for an increase in GHG emission (delta(CO2) = 1.46 +/- 0.47 and delta(N2 O) = 1.49 +/- 1.22; (x) over bar +/- SD) and in pest (nematode) incidence (delta(nematode abundance) = 1.29 +/- 1.61). It is also important to highlight that, in some cases, tillage could offset the extent of ecosystem service benefits provided by cover crops. Based on this synthesis, we argue that cover crops should be incorporated into modern agricultural practices because of the many environmental benefits they offer, particularly the maintenance of soil and ecosystem health. More importantly, there was generally an increase in cash crop yield with cover cropping (delta(yied) = 1.15 +/- 0.75), likely due to improvement in various soil processes. Despite its benefits, the complexity of cover crop management should not be overlooked, and site-specific factors such as climate, soil type, cover crop species and tillage practices must be considered in order to optimize the benefits of cover cropping. In addition to crop yield, detailed economic analyses are needed to calculate the direct (e.g., reduction in the amount of chemical fertilizer) and indirect monetary benefits (e.g., the improvement of soil quality) of cover crops. Such a comprehensive analysis could serve as incentive for producers to integrate cover crops into their management practices.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 373
页数:17
相关论文
共 148 条
[1]   Dryland cropping systems influence the microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a semiarid sandy soil [J].
Acosta-Martinez, Veronica ;
Lascano, Robert ;
Calderon, Francisco ;
Booker, Jill D. ;
Zobeck, Ted M. ;
Upchurch, Dan R. .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2011, 47 (06) :655-667
[2]   Reduced tillage and cover crops improve water capture and reduce erosion of fine textured soils in raised bed tomato systems [J].
Alliaume, F. ;
Rossing, W. A. H. ;
Tittonell, P. ;
Jorge, G. ;
Dogliotti, S. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 183 :127-137
[3]   Soil Phosphorus Bioavailability and Soybean Grain Yield Impaired by Ruzigrass [J].
Almeida, Danilo S. ;
Rocha, Kassiano F. ;
de Souza, Murilo ;
Delai, Lucas B. ;
Rosolem, Ciro A. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2018, 110 (02) :654-663
[4]   RATIOS OF MICROBIAL BIOMASS CARBON TO TOTAL ORGANIC-CARBON IN ARABLE SOILS [J].
ANDERSON, TH ;
DOMSCH, KH .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1989, 21 (04) :471-479
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, FAO Soils Bulletin
[6]   An ecosystem services perspective on brush management: research priorities for competing land-use objectives [J].
Archer, Steven R. ;
Predick, Katharine I. .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2014, 102 (06) :1394-1407
[7]   Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen as influenced by organic and inorganic inputs at Kabete, Kenya [J].
Baaru, M. W. ;
Mungendi, D. N. ;
Bationo, A. ;
Verchot, L. ;
Waceke, W. .
ADVANCES IN INTEGRATED SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES, 2007, :827-832
[8]   Cereal/legume rotation effects on cereal growth in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa:: soil mineral nitrogen, mycorrhizae and nematodes [J].
Bagayoko, M ;
Buerkert, A ;
Lung, G ;
Bationo, A ;
Römheld, V .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2000, 218 (1-2) :103-116
[9]  
Balbinot AA, 2017, PESQUI AGROPECU BRAS, V52, P592, DOI [10.1590/s0100-204x2017000800004, 10.1590/S0100-204X2017000800004]
[10]   LONG-TERM LAND USE INFLUENCES SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS P AND S, PHOSPHATASE AND ARYLSULFATASE ACTIVITIES, AND S MINERALIZATION IN A BRAZILIAN OXISOL [J].
Balota, Elcio L. ;
Yada, Ines F. ;
Amaral, Higo ;
Nakatani, Andre S. ;
Dick, Richard P. ;
Coyne, Mark S. .
LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 25 (04) :397-406