Cultural transmission and the evolution of human behaviour: a general approach based on the Price equation

被引:52
作者
El Mouden, C. [1 ,2 ]
Andre, J. -B. [3 ]
Morin, O. [4 ]
Nettle, D. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[2] Univ Oxford Nuffield Coll, Oxford OX1 1NF, England
[3] Ecole Normale Super, CNRS UMR 7625, Inst Biol, F-75231 Paris, France
[4] Konrad Lorenz Inst Evolut & Cognit Res, Altenberg, Austria
[5] Newcastle Univ, Ctr Behav & Evolut, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
[6] Newcastle Univ, Inst Neurosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
cultural evolution; cultural fitness; cultural group selection; dual-inheritance theory; human behavioural ecology; kin selection; Price equation; GROUP SELECTION; INCLUSIVE FITNESS; NATURAL-SELECTION; KIN SELECTION; OPTIMIZATION; INHERITANCE; COOPERATION; COVARIANCE; DIVERSITY; ALTRUISM;
D O I
10.1111/jeb.12296
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Transmitted culture can be viewed as an inheritance system somewhat independent of genes that is subject to processes of descent with modification in its own right. Although many authors have conceptualized cultural change as a Darwinian process, there is no generally agreed formal framework for defining key concepts such as natural selection, fitness, relatedness and altruism for the cultural case. Here, we present and explore such a framework using the Price equation. Assuming an isolated, independently measurable culturally transmitted trait, we show that cultural natural selection maximizes cultural fitness, a distinct quantity from genetic fitness, and also that cultural relatedness and cultural altruism are not reducible to or necessarily related to their genetic counterparts. We show that antagonistic coevolution will occur between genes and culture whenever cultural fitness is not perfectly aligned with genetic fitness, as genetic selection will shape psychological mechanisms to avoid susceptibility to cultural traits that bear a genetic fitness cost. We discuss the difficulties with conceptualizing cultural change using the framework of evolutionary theory, the degree to which cultural evolution is autonomous from genetic evolution, and the extent to which cultural change should be seen as a Darwinian process. We argue that the nonselection components of evolutionary change are much more important for culture than for genes, and that this and other important differences from the genetic case mean that different approaches and emphases are needed for cultural than genetic processes.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 241
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   THE CULTURAL-EVOLUTION OF BENEFICENT NORMS [J].
ALLISON, PD .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1992, 71 (02) :279-301
[2]  
Andersen ES, 2004, EVOLUTIONARY I EC RE, V1, P127, DOI DOI 10.14441/eier.1.127
[3]   Questioning the cultural evolution of altruism [J].
Andre, J. -B. ;
Morin, O. .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2011, 24 (12) :2531-2542
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1972, ANNU REV ECOL SYST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Evolution and the levels of selection, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199267972.001.0001
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach
[7]   The trouble with memes - Inference versus imitation in cultural creation [J].
Atran, S .
HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 2001, 12 (04) :351-381
[8]   Culture rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality [J].
Bell, Adrian V. ;
Richerson, Peter J. ;
McElreath, Richard .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (42) :17671-17674
[9]  
Boyd R, 1988, Culture and the evolutionary process
[10]   Rapid cultural adaptation can facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperation [J].
Boyd, Robert ;
Richerson, Peter J. ;
Henrich, Joseph .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2011, 65 (03) :431-444