Breath testing as potential colorectal cancer screening tool

被引:153
作者
Amal, Haitham [1 ,2 ]
Leja, Marcis [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Funka, Konrads [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lasina, Ieva [3 ]
Skapars, Roberts [3 ,4 ]
Sivins, Armands [3 ,4 ]
Ancans, Guntis [3 ,4 ]
Kikuste, Ilze [3 ,5 ]
Vanags, Aigars [5 ]
Tolmanis, Ivars [5 ]
Kirsners, Arnis [3 ]
Kupcinskas, Limas [6 ]
Haick, Hossam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, IL-3200003 Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Russell Berrie Nanotechnol Inst, IL-3200003 Haifa, Israel
[3] Univ Latvia, Fac Med, Riga, Latvia
[4] Riga East Univ Hosp, Dept Res, Riga, Latvia
[5] Digest Dis Ctr GASTRO, Riga, Latvia
[6] Lithuanian Univ Hlth Sci, Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
colorectal cancer; breath; diagnosis; sensor; spectrometry; VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; LUNG-CANCER; CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY; FOLLOW-UP; PARTICIPATION; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; NANOPARTICLES; POPULATION; BARRIERS; ARRAYS;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.29701
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is included in organized programs of many countries worldwide, there is still a place for better screening tools. In this study, 418 breath samples were collected from 65 patients with CRC, 22 with advanced or nonadvanced adenomas, and 122 control cases. All patients, including the controls, had undergone colonoscopy. The samples were analysed with two different techniques. The first technique relied on gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for identification and quantification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The T-test was used to identify significant VOCs (p values<0.017). The second technique relied on sensor analysis with a pattern recognition method for building a breath pattern to identify different groups. Blind analysis or leave-one-out cross validation was conducted for validation. The GC-MS analysis revealed four significant VOCs that identified the tested groups; these were acetone and ethyl acetate (higher in CRC), ethanol and 4-methyl octane (lower in CRC). The sensor-analysis distinguished CRC from the control group with 85% sensitivity, 94% specificity and 91% accuracy. The performance of the sensors in identifying the advanced adenoma group from the non-advanced adenomas was 88% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 94% accuracy. The performance of the sensors in identifying the advanced adenoma group was distinguished from the control group was 100% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 94% accuracy. For summary, volatile marker testing by using sensor analysis is a promising noninvasive approach for CRC screening. What's new? A breath test could help diagnose colorectal cancer, according to this new report. Because a breath test is minimally invasive, it could inspire better compliance than colonoscopy. These authors tested volatile organic compounds in breath samples from colorectal cancer cases and controls, using two different methods of analysis. They successfully identified four compounds that accurately identified the cancer patients, establishing a distinctive breath-print for colorectal cancer, possibly leading the way to a cheap, effective, non-invasive screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Improving compliance to colorectal cancer screening using blood and stool based tests in patients refusing screening colonoscopy in Germany [J].
Adler, Andreas ;
Geiger, Sebastian ;
Keil, Anne ;
Bias, Harald ;
Schatz, Philipp ;
deVos, Theo ;
Dhein, Jens ;
Zimmermann, Mathias ;
Tauber, Rudolf ;
Wiedenmann, Bertram .
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 14 :1-8
[2]   Exhaled volatile organic compounds identify patients with colorectal cancer [J].
Altomare, D. F. ;
Di Lena, M. ;
Porcelli, F. ;
Trizio, L. ;
Travaglio, E. ;
Tutino, M. ;
Dragonieri, S. ;
Memeo, V. ;
de Gennaro, G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (01) :144-151
[3]   Detection of precancerous gastric lesions and gastric cancer through exhaled breath [J].
Amal, Haitham ;
Leja, Marcis ;
Funka, Konrads ;
Skapars, Roberts ;
Sivins, Armands ;
Ancans, Guntis ;
Liepniece-Karele, Inta ;
Kikuste, Ilze ;
Lasina, Ieva ;
Haick, Hossam .
GUT, 2016, 65 (03) :400-407
[4]   Assessment of ovarian cancer conditions from exhaled breath [J].
Amal, Haitham ;
Shi, Da-You ;
Ionescu, Radu ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Hua, Qing-Ling ;
Pan, Yue-Yin ;
Tao, Li ;
Liu, Hu ;
Haick, Hossam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (06) :E614-E622
[5]   The scent fingerprint of hepatocarcinoma: in-vitro metastasis prediction with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [J].
Amal, Haitham ;
Ding, Lu ;
Liu, Bin-bin ;
Tisch, Ulrike ;
Xu, Zhen-qin ;
Shi, Da-you ;
Zhao, Yan ;
Chen, Jie ;
Sun, Rui-xia ;
Liu, Hu ;
Ye, Sheng-Long ;
Tang, Zhao-you ;
Haick, Hossam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE, 2012, 7 :4135-4146
[6]   Assessment of the exhalation kinetics of volatile cancer biomarkers based on their physicochemical properties [J].
Amann, Anton ;
Mochalski, Pawel ;
Ruzsanyi, Vera ;
Broza, Yoav Y. ;
Haick, Hossam .
JOURNAL OF BREATH RESEARCH, 2014, 8 (01)
[7]  
Amann A, 2011, EXPERT REV MOL DIAGN, V11, P207, DOI [10.1586/ERM.10.112, 10.1586/erm.10.112]
[8]   Detection of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) by Urinary Volatile Organic Compound Analysis [J].
Arasaradnam, Ramesh P. ;
McFarlane, Michael J. ;
Ryan-Fisher, Courtenay ;
Westenbrink, Erik ;
Hodges, Paula ;
Thomas, Matthew G. ;
Chambers, Samantha ;
O'Connell, Nicola ;
Bailey, Catherine ;
Harmston, Christopher ;
Nwokolo, Chuka U. ;
Bardhan, Karna D. ;
Covington, James A. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09)
[9]   Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial [J].
Atkin, Wendy S. ;
Edwards, Rob ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Hart, Andrew R. ;
Northover, John M. A. ;
Parkin, D. Max ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Cuzick, Jack .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726) :1624-1633
[10]   Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Stock, Christian ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348