Computational analysis of M-O covalency in M(OC6H5)4 (M = Ti, Zr, Hf, Ce, Th, U)

被引:33
作者
Berryman, Victoria E. J. [1 ]
Whalley, Zoe J. [1 ]
Shephard, Jacob J. [2 ]
Ochiai, Tatsumi [2 ]
Price, Amy N. [2 ]
Arnold, Polly L. [2 ]
Parsons, Simon [2 ]
Kaltsoyannis, Nikolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Chem, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh Kings Bldg, EaStCHEM Sch Chem, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
RAY-ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; GAUSSIAN-BASIS SETS; ELECTRON LOCALIZATION; HARTREE-FOCK; BOND ORDERS; ATOMS LI; DELOCALIZATION; COMPLEXES; MOLECULES; ACTINIDES;
D O I
10.1039/c8dt05094e
中图分类号
O61 [无机化学];
学科分类号
070301 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A series of compounds M(OC6H5)(4) (M = Ti, Zr, Hf, Ce, Th, U) is studied with hybrid density functional theory, to assess M-O bond covalency. The series allows for the comparison of d and f element compounds that are structurally similar. Two well-established analysis methods are employed: Natural Bond Orbital and the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules. A consistent pattern emerges; the U-O bond is the most covalent, followed by Ce-O and Th-O, with those involving the heavier transition metals the least so. The covalency of the Ti-O bond differs relative to Ce-O and Th-O, with the orbital-based method showing greater relative covalency for Ti than the electron density-based methods. The deformation energy of r(M-O) correlates with the d orbital contribution from the metal to the M-O bond, while no such correlation is found for the f orbital component. f orbital involvement in M-O bonding is an important component of covalency, facilitating orbital overlap and allowing for greater expansion of the electrons, thus lowering their kinetic energy.
引用
收藏
页码:2939 / 2947
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]   Segmented contraction scheme for small-core actinide pseudopotential basis sets [J].
Cao, XY ;
Dolg, M .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE-THEOCHEM, 2004, 673 (1-3) :203-209
[12]   Valence basis sets for relativistic energy-consistent small-core actinide pseudopotentials [J].
Cao, XY ;
Dolg, M ;
Stoll, H .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 118 (02) :487-496
[13]   COVALENT BOND ORDERS IN THE TOPOLOGICAL THEORY OF ATOMS IN MOLECULES [J].
CIOSLOWSKI, J ;
MIXON, ST .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1991, 113 (11) :4142-4145
[14]   Complementarity of QTAIM and MO theory in the study of bonding in donor-acceptor complexes [J].
Corts-Guzmán, F ;
Bader, RFW .
COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS, 2005, 249 (5-6) :633-662
[15]   Electronic structure theory to decipher the chemical bonding in actinide systems [J].
Dognon, Jean-Pierre .
COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS, 2017, 344 :150-162
[16]   Assessment of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional [J].
Ernzerhof, M ;
Scuseria, GE .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 110 (11) :5029-5036
[17]  
Feller D, 1996, J COMPUT CHEM, V17, P1571, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199610)17:13<1571::AID-JCC9>3.0.CO
[18]  
2-P
[19]   Toward a Consistent Interpretation of the QTAIM: Tortuous Link between Chemical Bonds, Interactions, and Bond/Line Paths [J].
Foroutan-Nejad, Cina ;
Shahbazian, Shant ;
Marek, Radek .
CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (32) :10140-10152
[20]   The Lewis model and beyond [J].
Fradera, X ;
Austen, MA ;
Bader, RFW .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1999, 103 (02) :304-314