Component Ranking by Birnbaum Importance in Presence of Epistemic Uncertainty in Failure Event Probabilities

被引:20
作者
Baraldi, Piero [1 ,2 ]
Compare, Michele [2 ]
Zio, Enrico [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, Milan, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, Milan, Italy
[3] Ecole Cent Paris & Supelec, European Fdn New Energy Elect France, Paris, France
关键词
Birnbaum importance measure; importance ranking; possibility theory; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/TR.2013.2240885
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Birnbaum Importance Measure (IM) allows ranking the components of a system with respect to the impact that their failures have on the system's performance, e.g., its reliability or availability. Such ranking is done in industry to efficiently manage Operation and Maintenance (O&M) activities, and to optimize plant design. In the computation of the Birnbaum IM of the components, uncertainty in the parameters of the system model is often neglected. This neglect may lead to erroneous, possibly non-conservative ranking. In this work, we develop a method based on Possibility Theory (PT) for giving due account to epistemic uncertainties in Birnbaum IMs. An example is given with reference to the components of the Auxiliary FeedWater System (AFWS) of a Nuclear Power Plant.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Possibility Theory
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, SORTING SEARCHING
[3]   THE CONCEPT OF PROBABILITY IN SAFETY ASSESSMENTS OF TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS [J].
APOSTOLAKIS, G .
SCIENCE, 1990, 250 (4986) :1359-1364
[4]   On the use of uncertainty importance measures in reliability and risk analysis [J].
Aven, T. ;
Nokland, T. E. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (02) :127-133
[5]   On the ontological status of the concept of risk [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Renn, Ortwin ;
Rosa, Eugene A. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2011, 49 (8-9) :1074-1079
[6]   A method for ranking components importance in presence of epistemic uncertainties [J].
Baraldi, P. ;
Zio, E. ;
Compare, M. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2009, 22 (05) :582-592
[7]  
Baraldi P., 2011, P EUROPEAN SAFETY RE, P2167
[8]   A Comparison Between Probabilistic and Dempster-Shafer Theory Approaches to Model Uncertainty Analysis in the Performance Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories [J].
Baraldi, Piero ;
Zio, Enrico .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (07) :1139-1156
[9]   Representing parametric probabilistic models tainted with imprecision [J].
Baudrit, C. ;
Dubois, D. ;
Perrot, N. .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2008, 159 (15) :1913-1928
[10]   Practical representations of incomplete probabilistic knowledge [J].
Baudrit, C. ;
Dubois, D. .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2006, 51 (01) :86-108