Recent trends on community detection algorithms: A survey

被引:11
作者
Gupta, Sumit [1 ]
Singh, Dhirendra Pratap [1 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Natl Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
来源
MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B | 2020年 / 34卷 / 35期
关键词
Community detection; social network; graph partitioning; graph clustering; overlapping community detection algorithm; non-overlapping community detection algorithm; COMPLEX NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1142/S0217984920504084
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
In today's world scenario, many of the real-life problems and application data can be represented with the help of the graphs. Nowadays technology grows day by day at a very fast rate; applications generate a vast amount of valuable data, due to which the size of their representation graphs is increased. How to get meaningful information from these data become a hot research topic. Methodical algorithms are required to extract useful information from these raw data. These unstructured graphs are not scattered in nature, but these show some relationships between their basic entities. Identifying communities based on these relationships improves the understanding of the applications represented by graphs. Community detection algorithms are one of the solutions which divide the graph into small size clusters where nodes are densely connected within the cluster and sparsely connected across. During the last decade, there are lots of algorithms proposed which can be categorized into mainly two broad categories; non-overlapping and overlapping community detection algorithm. The goal of this paper is to offer a comparative analysis of the various community detection algorithms. We bring together all the state of art community detection algorithms related to these two classes into a single article with their accessible benchmark data sets. Finally, we represent a comparison of these algorithms concerning two parameters: one is time efficiency, and the other is how accurately the communities are detected.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks [J].
Ahn, Yong-Yeol ;
Bagrow, James P. ;
Lehmann, Sune .
NATURE, 2010, 466 (7307) :761-U11
[2]   Surprise maximization reveals the community structure of complex networks [J].
Aldecoa, Rodrigo ;
Marin, Ignacio .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2013, 3
[3]   Community detection in facebook activity networks and presenting a new multilayer label propagation algorithm for community detection [J].
Alimadadi, Fatemeh ;
Khadangi, Ehsan ;
Bagheri, Alireza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS B, 2019, 33 (10)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, COMPUT COMMUN, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2018.04.003
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Social Media Mining, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139088510
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ARXIV14072683
[7]  
[Anonymous], REPORT INFORM SYSTEM
[8]  
Backstrom L., 2006, P ACM SIGKDD INT C K
[9]   FOCS: Fast Overlapped Community Search [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Sanghamitra ;
Chowdhary, Garisha ;
Sengupta, Debarka .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2015, 27 (11) :2974-2985
[10]   Community detection in social networks [J].
Bedi, Punam ;
Sharma, Chhavi .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2016, 6 (03) :115-135