Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavicular block

被引:38
作者
Lecamwasam, H
Mayfield, J
Rosow, L
Chang, YC
Carter, C
Rosow, C
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Med Coll Georgia, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000205750.58424.b2
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Infraclavicular (IC) block is often performed by localizing one cord within the brachial plexus sheath and placing all the local anesthetic solution at that location. We hypothesized that posterior cord stimulation would be associated with a greater likelihood of IC block success. We enrolled 369 patients scheduled for surgery to the lower arm or hand in a prospective, nonrandomized observational trial. All underwent IC blocks using a standard technique, and the cord stimulated immediately before drug injection was recorded. Motor and sensory functioning were evaluated 15 min after injection. Compared with stimulation of either the lateral or medial cord, stimulation of the posterior cord was associated with rapid onset of motor block in significantly more nerves, as well as a decreased likelihood of block failure (motor and sensory block inadequate to perform surgery). Failure rates were 5.8% for posterior cord, 28.3% for lateral (P < 0.05), and 15.4% for medial (P < 0.05). The differences were highly significant when adjusted for multiple possible confounders, such as gender, body mass index, location of the incision, and level of training of the individual performing the block (P < 0.001, lateral versus posterior; P = 0.003, medial versus posterior). A low failure rate was also predicted by stimulation of more than one cord simultaneously (P < 0.05). We conclude that injection after locating the posterior cord or multiple cords predicts successful IC block.
引用
收藏
页码:1564 / 1568
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] At the cords, the pinkie towards: Interpreting infraclavicular motor responses to neurostimulation
    Borene, SC
    Edwards, JN
    Boezaart, AP
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2004, 29 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [2] An evaluation of the infraclavicular block via a modified approach of the Raj technique
    Borgeat, A
    Ekatodramis, G
    Dumont, C
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (02) : 436 - 441
  • [3] Infraclavicular plexus block: Multiple injection versus single injection
    Gaertner, E
    Estebe, JP
    Zamfir, A
    Cuby, C
    Macaire, P
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (06) : 590 - 594
  • [4] Infraclavicular block with lateral approach and nerve stimulation: Extent of anesthesia and adverse effects
    Jandard, C
    Gentili, ME
    Girard, F
    Ecoffey, C
    Heck, M
    Laxenaire, MC
    Bouaziz, H
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [5] Lateral infraclavicular plexus block vs. axillary block for hand and forearm surgery
    Kapral, S
    Jandrasits, O
    Schabernig, C
    Likar, R
    Reddy, B
    Mayer, N
    Weinstabl, C
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 43 (10) : 1047 - 1052
  • [6] INFRACLAVICULAR VERTICAL BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCKADE - A NEW TECHNIQUE OF REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
    KILKA, HG
    GEIGER, P
    MEHRKENS, HH
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 1995, 44 (05): : 339 - 344
  • [7] Labat G., 1927, ANESTH ANALG, V6, P81
  • [8] Use of ultrasound to control depth of needle insertion - Reply to Dr. Riopelle
    Ootaki, C
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2001, 26 (04) : 384 - 385
  • [9] Porter JM, 2005, CAN J ANAESTH, V52, P69, DOI 10.1007/BF03018583
  • [10] RAJ PP, 1973, ANESTH ANALG, V52, P897