Comparison of flight test data with a computational fluid dynamics model of a Scottish Aviation Bulldog aircraft

被引:4
作者
Lawson, N. J. [1 ]
Salmon, N. [1 ]
Gautrey, J. E. [1 ]
Bailey, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Natl Flying Lab Ctr, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
关键词
The following paper presents detailed aerodynamic data of a Scottish Aviation Bulldog light aircraft. The data is taken from the pre-stall region of the aircraft flight envelope through two flight test methods and from a geometrically accurate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the full scale aircraft; which was meshed in Ansys ICEM CFD and solved in Ansys Fluent. The fidelity of the CFD model was achieved by development of a CATIA solid model with surfaces matching a spatial point cloud of the aircraft taken using a 3D laser scanner. Following a CFD verification process; a 3.4m hybrid mesh with a Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model was found to give the best overall lift and drag characteristics. Further detailed comparisons with the glide flight test data showed the CFD drag polar to have 63% lower zero lift drag; although this discrepancy was related to the simplification of the original CATIA surface model; which excluded the undercarriage; aerials and other protuberance drags. Inclusion of estimates of these sources of drag resulted in a match in zero lift drag to within 15% and a maximum lift to drag of 10:1 which was within 11% of the glide flight test result. The remaining drag discrepancy is attributed to other effects including trim drag and the surface finish of the actual aircraft;
D O I
10.1017/S000192400000885X
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The following paper presents detailed aerodynamic data of a Scottish Aviation Bulldog light aircraft. The data is taken from the pre-stall region of the aircraft flight envelope through two flight test methods and from a geometrically accurate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the full scale aircraft, which was meshed in Ansys ICEM CFD and solved in Ansys Fluent. The fidelity of the CFD model was achieved by development of a CATIA solid model with surfaces matching a spatial point cloud of the aircraft taken using a 3D laser scanner. Following a CFD verification process, a 3 center dot 4m hybrid mesh with a Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model was found to give the best overall lift and drag characteristics. Further detailed comparisons with the glide flight test data showed the CFD drag polar to have 63% lower zero lift drag, although this discrepancy was related to the simplification of the original CATIA surface model, which excluded the undercarriage, aerials and other protuberance drags. Inclusion of estimates of these sources of drag resulted in a match in zero lift drag to within 15% and a maximum lift to drag of 10:1 which was within 11% of the glide flight test result. The remaining drag discrepancy is attributed to other effects including trim drag and the surface finish of the actual aircraft.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1291
页数:19
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Akerlind O., 2006, INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RE
[2]  
Anderson J.D., 2011, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, P357
[3]  
Anderson John David, 1995, Computational Fluid Dynamics, V206
[4]  
[Anonymous], SUMM 4 AIAA CFD DRAG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 20010538 AIAA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, LEICA SCANSTATION 2
[7]  
Argawal R, 1999, ANNU REV FLUID MECH, V31, P125
[8]  
Barlow J.B., 1999, Low-speed wind tunnel testing
[9]   Scaling: Wind tunnel to flight [J].
Bushnell, DM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2006, 38 :111-128
[10]   An evaluation of RANS turbulence modelling for aerodynamic applications [J].
Catalano, P ;
Amato, M .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 7 (07) :493-509