Do the rich have stronger willingness to pay for environmental protection? New evidence from a survey in China

被引:176
作者
Shao, Shuai [1 ]
Tian, Zhihua [1 ]
Fan, Meiting [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Finance & Econ Res, Sch Urban & Reg Sci, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Household income; Environmental pollution; Willingness to pay; Ordered Logit model; Nighttime lights data; China; AIR-POLLUTION; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; QUALITY; GROWTH; VALUES; DEGRADATION; PERSPECTIVE; AFFLUENCE; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.033
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The majority of existing studies argue that rich people and the residents in high-income countries and regions have stronger willingness to pay (WIT) for environmental protection. Does such a rule hold true for China at the present stage? Previous studies pay little attention to this issue due to the lack of related data. Merging the micro data from the Chinese General Social Survey in 2010 (CGSS2010) with the macro data at the corresponding urban level of China, as well as two types of satellite monitoring data, this paper investigates the effect of income on residents' WTP for environmental protection at both macro and micro perspectives based on the ordered Logit model. The results show that the rich do have stronger WTP for environmental protection. However, with the increase in residents' income, the marginal WTP for environmental protection will decline, and a reversal occurs at the top income level. Therefore, the WTP does not always rise with the increase in income, and the middle-income class has the strongest WTP for environmental protection. Moreover, after controlling individual characteristics, residents' WTP for environmental protection more depends on environmental pollution degree rather than urban average income level measured by both GDP per capita and the nighttime lights data from satellite monitoring. The residents in more polluted cities have stronger WTP for environmental protection. Therefore, it is not reasonable to improve people's environmental preferences purely through economic development. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 94
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Econ. Res
[2]  
Auci S, 2006, 239 CEIS TOR VERG U
[3]   The Dollars and Sense of Ballot Propositions: Estimating Willingness to Pay for Public Goods Using Aggregate Voting Data [J].
Burkhardt, Jesse ;
Chan, Nathan W. .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2017, 4 (02) :479-503
[4]   Using luminosity data as a proxy for economic statistics [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Nordhaus, William D. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (21) :8589-8594
[5]  
Dunlap RE, 1997, SOC SCI QUART, V78, P24
[6]   Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite? [J].
Dunlap, RE ;
Mertig, AG .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1995, 51 (04) :121-137
[7]   The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys [J].
Dunlap, Riley E. ;
Yolk, Richard .
SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2008, 49 (03) :529-563
[8]   Growth, Pollution, and Life Expectancy: China from 1991-2012 [J].
Ebenstein, Avraham ;
Fan, Maoyong ;
Greenstone, Michael ;
He, Guojun ;
Yin, Peng ;
Zhou, Maigeng .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (05) :226-231
[9]   Rich People, Poor People, and Environmental Concern: Evidence across Nations and Time [J].
Fairbrother, Malcolm .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2013, 29 (05) :910-922
[10]   Acquiescence and the Willingness to Pay for Environmental Protection: A Comparison of the ISSP, WVS, and EVS [J].
Franzen, Axel ;
Vogl, Dominikus .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2013, 94 (03) :637-659