In vitro comparison of personalized 3D printed versus standard expandable titanium vertebral body replacement implants in the mid-thoracic spine using entire rib cage specimens

被引:13
作者
Liebsch, Christian [1 ]
Aleinikov, Viktor [2 ]
Kerimbayev, Talgat [2 ]
Akshulakov, Serik [2 ]
Kocak, Tugrul [3 ]
Vogt, Morten [1 ]
Jansen, Jan Ulrich [1 ]
Wilke, Hans-Joachim [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Trauma Res Ctr Ulm, Inst Orthopaed Res & Biomech, Ulm, Germany
[2] Natl Ctr Neurosurg, Nur Sultan, Kazakhstan
[3] Ulm Univ, Dept Orthoped, Ulm, Germany
关键词
Vertebral body replacement implant; Thoracic spine; Rib cage; Primary stability; In vitro study; Biomechanics; PROSTHESIS; FRACTURES; SERIES; CORPECTOMY; STABILITY; OUTCOMES; PLATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105070
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Expandable titanium implants have proven their suitability as vertebral body replacement device in several clinical and biomechanical studies. Potential stabilizing features of personalized 3D printed titanium devices, however, have never been explored. This in vitro study aimed to prove their equivalence regarding primary stability and three-dimensional motion behavior in the mid-thoracic spine including the entire rib cage. Methods: Six fresh frozen human thoracic spine specimens with intact rib cages were loaded with pure moments of 5 Nm while performing optical motion tracking of all vertebrae. Following testing in intact condition (1), the specimens were tested after inserting personalized 3D printed titanium vertebral body replacement implants (2) and the two standard expandable titanium implants Obelise (TM) (3) and Synex (TM) (4), each at T6 level combined with posterior pedicle screw-rod fixation from T4 to T8. Findings: No significant differences (P < .05) in primary and secondary T1-T12 ranges of motion were found between the three implant types. Compared to the intact condition, slight decreases of the range of motion were found, which were significant for Synex (TM) in primary flexion/extension (-17%), specifically at T3-T4 level (-46%), primary lateral bending (-18%), and secondary lateral bending during primary axial rotation (-53%). Range of motion solely increased at T8-T9 level, while being significant only for Obelise (TM) (+35%). Interpretation: Personalized 3D printed vertebral body replacement implants provide a promising alternative to standard expandable devices regarding primary stability and three-dimensional motion behavior in the midthoracic spine due to the stabilizing effect of the rib cage.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Adler D., 2019, MATERIALS, V12
[2]   Vertebral body replacement systems with expandable cages in the treatment of various spinal pathologies: A prospectively followed case series of 60 patients [J].
Arts, Mark P. ;
Peul, Wilco C. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (03) :537-544
[3]   Comparison of Allograft Bone and Titanium Cages for Vertebral Body Replacement in the Thoracolumbar Spine: A Biomechanical Study [J].
Cardenas, Raul J. ;
Javalkar, Vijayakumar ;
Patil, Shashikant ;
Gonzalez-Cruz, Jorge ;
Ogden, Alan ;
Mukherjee, Debi ;
Nanda, Anil .
NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 66 (06) :ONS314-ONS318
[4]   Reconstruction of Thoracic Spine Using a Personalized 3D-Printed Vertebral Body in Adolescent with T9 Primary Bone Tumor [J].
Choy, Wen Jie ;
Mobbs, Ralph J. ;
Wilcox, Ben ;
Phan, Steven ;
Phan, Kevin ;
Sutterlin, Chester E., III .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 105 :1032.e13-1032.e17
[5]   En bloc spondylectomy reconstructions in a biomechanical in-vitro study [J].
Disch, A. C. ;
Schaser, K. D. ;
Melcher, I. ;
Luzzati, A. ;
Feraboli, F. ;
Schmoelz, W. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (05) :715-725
[6]   Biomechanical analysis of the upper thoracic spine after decompressive procedures [J].
Healy, Andrew T. ;
Lubelski, Daniel ;
Mageswaran, Prasath ;
Bhowmick, Deb A. ;
Bartsch, Adam J. ;
Benzel, Edward C. ;
Mroz, Thomas E. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (06) :1010-1016
[7]   Thoracic lateral extracavitary corpectomy for anterior column reconstruction with expandable and static titanium cages: Clinical outcomes and surgical considerations in a consecutive case series [J].
Holland, Christopher M. ;
Bass, David I. ;
Gary, Matthew F. ;
Howard, Brian M. ;
Refai, Daniel .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 129 :37-43
[8]   VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT WITH A CERAMIC PROSTHESIS FOR METASTATIC SPINAL TUMORS [J].
HOSONO, N ;
YONENOBU, K ;
FUJI, T ;
EBARA, S ;
YAMASHITA, K ;
ONO, K .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (22) :2454-2462
[9]   Three-dimensional motion analysis with Synex - Comparative biomechanical test series with a new vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine [J].
Knop, C ;
Lange, U ;
Bastian, L ;
Blauth, M .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (06) :472-485
[10]   Der Wirbelkörperersatz mit Synex® bei kombinierter dorsoventraler Behandlung thorakolumbaler VerletzungenVertebral Body Replacement with Synex® in Combined Posteroanterior Surgery for Treatment of Thoracolumbar Injuries [J].
Christian Knop ;
Uta Lange ;
Maximilian Reinhold ;
Michael Blauth .
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2005, 17 (3) :249-280