Comparative responsiveness of the Hand 20 and the DASH-JS']JSSH questionnaires to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release

被引：11

作者：

Iwatsuki, K. ^{[1
]}

Nishikawa, K. ^{[2
]}

Chaki, M. ^{[3
]}

Sato, A. ^{[4
]}

Morita, A. ^{[5
]}

Hirata, H. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Hand Surg, Nagoya, Aichi 4668550, Japan

[2] Nagoya Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

[3] Chunichi Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

[4] Suzuka Kaisei Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Suzuka, Japan

[5] Suzuka Kaisei Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Suzuka, Japan

来源：

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME | 2014年 / 39卷 / 02期

关键词：

Hand; 20; Japanese; DASH-[!text type='JS']JS[!/text]SH; carpal tunnel syndrome; responsiveness; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; JAPANESE-SOCIETY; SYNDROME INSTRUMENT; OUTCOME MEASURE; SHOULDER; ARM; DISABILITIES; VERSION; VALIDATION; SURGERY;

D O I：

10.1177/1753193413485524

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

This study compared the responsiveness of the Hand 20 and the Japanese version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-JSSH) questionnaires in carpal tunnel syndrome. The scores before and 3 months after surgery were used to calculate the standardized response mean and effect size. Of 57 patients enrolled in the study, 13 underwent open carpal tunnel release and 44 had endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The standardized response mean and the effect size of the Hand 20 scale were 0.60 and 0.54, respectively, and those of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scale were 0.39 and 0.36, respectively. Compared with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the Hand 20 questionnaire appears to have better responsiveness for assessing the effect of treatment by carpal tunnel release.

引用

页码：145 / 151

页数：7

共 36 条

[1]

Alotaibi Naser M, 2008, Occup Ther Int, V15, P178, DOI 10.1002/oti.252

[2] The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire - Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients [J].

Atroshi, I ;

Gummesson, C ;

Andersson, B ;

Dahlgren, E ;

Johansson, A .

ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 71 (06) :613-618

[3] Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].

Beaton, DE ;

Bombardier, C ;

Guillemin, F ;

Ferraz, MB .

SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191

[4]

Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, P147

[5]

CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160

[6] Outcomes evaluation in orthopaedics [J].

Dawson, J ;

Carr, A .

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (03) :313-315

[7] Responsiveness of the Dutch version of the dash as an outcome measure for carpal tunnel syndrome [J].

De Smet, L. ;

De Kesel, R. ;

Degreef, I. ;

Debeer, P. .

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2007, 32E (01) :74-76

[8] Responsiveness of the DASH score in surgically treated basal joint arthritis of the thumb: preliminary results [J].

De Smet, L .

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2004, 23 (03) :223-224

[9]

Dubert T, 2001, Chir Main, V20, P294, DOI 10.1016/S1297-3203(01)00049-X

[10] Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release [J].

Gay, RE ;

Amadio, PC ;

Johnson, JC .

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 28A (02) :250-254

← 1 2 3 4 →