An Integrated Two-Dimension Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Supplier Selection

被引:5
作者
Li, Chong [1 ]
Huang, He [1 ]
Luo, Ya [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Res Inst Elect Engn, Nanjing 210007, Peoples R China
关键词
sustainable supplier selection; two-dimension linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set; multiattribute group decision-making; best-worst method; MULTIMOORA; POWER-LINE INSPECTION; BEST-WORST; MODEL; MULTIMOORA; ALLOCATION; TOPSIS; ANP;
D O I
10.3390/su141811666
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and their applications in problems such as power line inspection, selecting the appropriate UAV supplier according to several sustainable attributes has attracted many interests. In this regard, an integrated multiattribute group decision-making (MAGDM) method based on the best-worst method (BWM) and MULTIMOORA method with two-dimension linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy variables (2DLIFVs) is proposed in this paper for the selection of UAV suppliers. First, the 2DLIFV is utilized to represent the uncertain, fuzzy, and linguistic evaluations of the experts on the evaluation attributes. Second, the two-dimension linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy BWM (2DLIF-BWM) is introduced to compute the weights of the attributes. Then, a novel expert weight calculation method that combines the uncertainty degree and consensus degree of the experts is introduced. Next, the 2DLIF-MULTIMOORA method is proposed, where the aggregation operators and distance measures of the 2DLIFVs are used to determine the ranking results of different alternatives. Finally, a real case of selecting a sustainable UAV supplier for power line inspection is presented to illustrate the process of the proposed method. The experimental results are further analyzed through sensitivity and comparative analyses to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. From the results, it can be found that the proposed method can more flexibly represent the uncertain assessments while providing reasonable and reliable results.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [41] Green Supplier Selection With a Continuous Interval-Valued Linguistic TODIM Method
    Nie, Song
    Liao, Huchang
    Wu, Xingli
    Xu, Zeshui
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 124315 - 124328
  • [42] A novel fuzzy hybrid neutrosophic decision-making approach for the resilient supplier selection problem
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Yazdani, Morteza
    Obradovic, Radojko
    Kumar, Anil
    Torres-Jimenez, Mercedes
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 35 (12) : 1934 - 1986
  • [43] A resilience approach for supplier selection: Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process and grey VIKOR techniques
    Parkouhi, Sahar Valipour
    Ghadikolaei, Abdolhamid Safaei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 161 : 431 - 451
  • [44] Puska A, 2018, ECON COMPUT ECON CYB, V52, P217, DOI 10.24818/18423264/52.2.18.13
  • [45] An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment
    Qin, Jindong
    Liu, Xinwang
    Pedrycz, Witold
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 258 (02) : 626 - 638
  • [46] Applying the triple bottom line in sustainable supplier selection: A meta-review of the state-of-the-art
    Rashidi, Kamran
    Noorizadeh, Abdollah
    Kannan, Devika
    Cullinane, Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 269
  • [47] A comparison of fuzzy DEA and fuzzy TOPSIS in sustainable supplier selection: Implications for sourcing strategy
    Rashidi, Kamran
    Cullinane, Kevin
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 121 : 266 - 281
  • [48] Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    van Roekel, Wilco S.
    Tavasszy, Lori
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2018, 68 : 158 - 169
  • [49] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 64 : 126 - 130
  • [50] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57