Ethical and political issues in contemporary research relationships

被引:18
作者
Aldred, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E London, Sch Social Sci Media & Cultural Studies, London E16 2RD, England
来源
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION | 2008年 / 42卷 / 05期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
contractualism; elites; ethics; institutional relationships; NHS; organizational research; professionalism;
D O I
10.1177/0038038508094568
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This article discusses how ethical and political issues affect contemporary research relationships. It focuses on the responsibilities of researchers studying organizations and elites, and the discussion draws upon the author's experience of researching NHS primary health care services. The article reviews the spread of 'ethical guidelines' from medical to social research. Such guidelines primarily address ethical problems relating to individual researcher-researched relationships. Sociologists have criticized the application of medically based guidelines to social research, while often accepting an ethical framework based on the researcher-researched dyad. But this limited conception of ethical responsibilities leaves complex organizational power hierarchies and their effects undertheorized. Researchers may then be vulnerable and lack guidance where organizational loyalties and market mechanisms have undermined the traditional supports of academic independence and professionalism. Sociologists could learn from critical medical scientists' responses to some related ethical dilemmas, as some medical researchers have experienced these issues more acutely and for longer.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 903
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Alderson P, 2006, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V9, P405, DOI DOI 10.1080/13645570500435207
  • [2] ALDRED R, 2007, THESIS U LONDON
  • [3] ALDRED R, 2008, DRUG BUDDIES EVIDENC
  • [4] ALDRED R, 2008, INT J MANAGEMENT CON, V3, P48
  • [5] Closed policy networks, broken chains of communication and the stories behind an 'entrepreneurial policy': The case of NHS Local Improvement Finance Trust (NHS LIFT)
    Aldred, Rachel
    [J]. CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2007, 27 (01) : 139 - 151
  • [6] [Anonymous], ETHICS WHOSE ETHICS
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2007, The threat to reason: How the enlightenment was hijacked and how we can reclaim it
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1986, Feminist Social Psychology
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2006, The Political Economy of Health Care: A Clinical Perspective
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2003, The British Sociological Association: A Sociological History