Abiotic stress and plant responses from the whole vine to the genes

被引:76
|
作者
Cramer, G. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
abscisic acid; salinity; water deficit; WATER-DEFICIT STRESS; DNA-BINDING DOMAIN; ABSCISIC-ACID; XYLEM SAP; GALACTINOL-SYNTHASE; CABERNET-SAUVIGNON; CV SHIRAZ; EXPRESSION; ABA; GRAPEVINE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00058.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Drought, salinity and extreme temperatures significantly limit the distribution of grapes around the world. In this review, the literature of grape responses to abiotic stress with particular reference to whole plant and molecular responses observed in recent studies is discussed. A number of short-term and long-term studies on grapevine shoots and berries have been conducted using a systems biology approach. Transcripts, proteins and metabolites were profiled. Water deficit, salinity and chilling altered the steady-state abundance of a large number of transcripts. Common responses to these stresses included changes in hormone metabolism, particularly abscisic acid (ABA), photosynthesis, growth, transcription, protein synthesis, signalling and cellular defences. Some of the transcriptional changes induced by stress were confirmed by proteomic and metabolomic analyses. More than 2000 genes were identified whose transcript abundance was altered by both water deficit and ABA. Different gene sets were used to map molecular pathways regulated by ABA, water deficit, salinity and chilling in grapevine. This work supports the hypothesis that ABA is a central regulator of abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms. ABA affects signalling pathways that trigger important molecular activities involving metabolism, transcription, protein synthesis, and cellular defence and also regulates important physiological responses such as stomatal conductance, photoprotection and growth. Systems biology approaches are providing more comprehensive understanding of the complex plant responses to abiotic stress. The molecular sets generated from mapping the ABA-inducible stress responses provide numerous targets for genetic and cultural manipulation for improved plant protection and grape quality.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 93
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Plant responses to abiotic stress
    Boscaiu, Monica
    Bautista, Inmaculada
    Donat, Pilar
    Lidon, Antonio
    Llinares, Josep
    Lull, Cristina
    Mayoral, Olga
    Vicente, Oscar
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 22 : S130 - S130
  • [2] Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant
    Chaves, MM
    Maroco, JP
    Pereira, JS
    FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2003, 30 (03) : 239 - 264
  • [3] Plant polyamines in abiotic stress responses
    Kamala Gupta
    Abhijit Dey
    Bhaskar Gupta
    Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2013, 35 : 2015 - 2036
  • [4] Plant miRNAs and abiotic stress responses
    Lu, Xiao-Yan
    Huang, Xue-Lin
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 368 (03) : 458 - 462
  • [5] Plant polyamines in abiotic stress responses
    Gupta, Kamala
    Dey, Abhijit
    Gupta, Bhaskar
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2013, 35 (07) : 2015 - 2036
  • [6] Lipid signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress
    Hou, Quancan
    Ufer, Guido
    Bartels, Dorothea
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 39 (05): : 1029 - 1048
  • [7] Epigenetic control of plant abiotic stress responses
    Ma, Lijun
    Xing, Lihe
    Li, Zicong
    Jiang, Danhua
    JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2025, 52 (02): : 129 - 144
  • [8] Are karrikins involved in plant abiotic stress responses?
    Li, Weiqiang
    Tran, Lam-Son Phan
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2015, 20 (09) : 535 - 538
  • [9] Alternative splicing in plant abiotic stress responses
    Punzo, Paola
    Grillo, Stefania
    Batelli, Giorgia
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2020, 48 (05) : 2117 - 2126
  • [10] RNA regulation in plant abiotic stress responses
    Nakaminami, Kentaro
    Matsui, Akihiro
    Shinozaki, Kazuo
    Seki, Motoaki
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS, 2012, 1819 (02): : 149 - 153