Understanding the Roles of the "Two QSARs"

被引:123
作者
Fujita, Toshio [1 ]
Winkler, David A. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, 38-1 Iwakura Miyakecho, Kyoto 6060022, Japan
[2] CSIRO Mfg, Bag 10, Clayton 3169, Australia
[3] Monash Inst Pharmaceut Sci, 392 Royal Parade, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, Latrobe Inst Mol Sci, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Chem & Phys Sci, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
关键词
REGULARIZED NEURAL-NETWORKS; FREE ENERGY RELATIONSHIP; PLANT-GROWTH REGULATORS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE; BIOLOGICAL-ACTIVITY; CLASSICAL QSAR; CHIRALITY DESCRIPTORS; MOLECULAR SIMILARITY; QSPR MODELS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00229
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) modeling has matured over the past 50 years and has been very useful in discovering and optimizing drug leads. Although its roots were in extra-thermodynamic relationships within small sets of chemically similar molecules focused on mechanistic interpretation, a second class of QSAR models has emerged that relies on machine learning methods to generate models from large, chemically diverse data sets for predictive purposes. There has been a tension between the two groups of QSAR practitioners that is unnecessary and possibly counterproductive. This paper explains the difference in philosophy and application of these two distinct, but equally important, classes of QSAR models and how they can work together synergistically to accelerate the discovery of new drugs or materials
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models [J].
Alexander, D. L. J. ;
Tropsha, A. ;
Winkler, David A. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2015, 55 (07) :1316-1322
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WILEY VCH
[3]  
[Anonymous], HDB MOL DESCRIPTORS
[4]   CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF APPLICABILITY OF A LINEAR FREE ENERGY RELATIONSHIP TO AROMATIC SUBSTITUTION REACTIONS [J].
BROWN, HC ;
STOCK, LM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1962, 84 (17) :3298-&
[5]   Optimal Sparse Descriptor Selection for QSAR Using Bayesian Methods [J].
Burden, F. R. ;
Winkler, D. A. .
QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, 2009, 28 (6-7) :645-653
[6]   Quantitative structure - Activity relationship studies using gaussian processes [J].
Burden, FR .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2001, 41 (03) :830-835
[7]   Robust QSAR models using Bayesian regularized neural networks [J].
Burden, FR ;
Winkler, DA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 42 (16) :3183-3187
[8]   Relevance Vector Machines: Sparse Classification Methods for QSAR [J].
Burden, Frank R. ;
Winkler, David A. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2015, 55 (08) :1529-1534
[9]   An Optimal Self-Pruning Neural Network and Nonlinear Descriptor Selection in QSAR [J].
Burden, Frank R. ;
Winkler, David A. .
QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, 2009, 28 (10) :1092-1097
[10]   SYNTHESIS, LIGAND-BINDING, AND QSAR (COMFA AND CLASSICAL) STUDY OF 3-BETA-(3'-SUBSTITUTED PHENYL), 3-BETA-(4'-SUBSTITUTED PHENYL), AND 3-BETA-(3',4'-DISUBSTITUTED PHENYL)TROPANE-2-BETA-CARBOXYLIC ACID METHYL-ESTERS [J].
CARROLL, FI ;
MASCARELLA, SW ;
KUZEMKO, MA ;
GAO, YG ;
ABRAHAM, P ;
LEWIN, AH ;
BOJA, JW ;
KUHAR, MJ .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 37 (18) :2865-2873