The effect of specific test queries on source-monitoring event-related potentials

被引:19
作者
Leynes, PA [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll New Jersey, Dept Psychol, Ewing, NJ 08628 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0278-2626(02)00505-5
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Source-monitoring decision processes were manipulated during retrieval while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Words were either seen or heard at study, and memory for modality was measured on two separate yes-no source tests. Decision processes were varied across the two tests by asking participants to respond to leading questions. One leading question asked if the items were seen at study, whereas the second question asked if the items were heard at study (cf., Marsh & Hicks, 1998). Behavioral responses indicated that leading questions altered the way in which memory was evaluated to determine the source of information. Varying the decision processes affected frontal-but not parietal ERP-sindicating that frontal ERPs reflect processing that is used to evaluate activated information. Furthermore, left and right frontal ERP activity was affected by the combination of test query and type of source supporting the hypothesis that both the right and left frontal lobes contribute to memory retrieval processes. The pattern of frontal ERP effects supports the hypothesis that activation in right frontal areas reflect basic decision processes that are used to determine source and that the left frontal lobes are recruited when more systematic processing is required by the test context. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 233
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   THE POSSIBLE ROLE OF SOURCE MISATTRIBUTIONS IN THE CREATION OF FALSE BELIEFS AMONG PRESCHOOLERS [J].
CECI, SJ ;
LOFTUS, EF ;
LEICHTMAN, MD ;
BRUCK, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPNOSIS, 1994, 42 (04) :304-320
[2]   RATE OF FALSE SOURCE ATTRIBUTIONS DEPENDS ON HOW QUESTIONS ARE ASKED [J].
DODSON, CS ;
JOHNSON, MK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 106 (04) :541-557
[3]   Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory [J].
Dodson, CS ;
Shimamura, AP .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (04) :1023-1044
[4]   Source monitoring: ERP evidence for greater reactivity to nontarget information in older adults [J].
Dywan, J ;
Segalowitz, SJ ;
Webster, L .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1998, 36 (03) :390-430
[5]   Cross-modal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events [J].
Henkel, LA ;
Franklin, N ;
Johnson, MK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (02) :321-335
[7]   SOURCE MONITORING [J].
JOHNSON, MK ;
HASHTROUDI, S ;
LINDSAY, DS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 114 (01) :3-28
[8]   Electrophysiological brain activity and memory source monitoring [J].
Johnson, MK ;
Kounios, J ;
Nolde, SF .
NEUROREPORT, 1996, 7 (18) :2929-2932
[9]   DIRECT VERSUS INDIRECT TESTS OF MEMORY FOR SOURCE - JUDGMENTS OF MODALITY [J].
KELLEY, CM ;
JACOBY, LL ;
HOLLINGSHEAD, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1989, 15 (06) :1101-1108
[10]  
Kucera H., 1967, COMPUTATIONAL ANAL P