Sample size calculations for studies designed to evaluate diagnostic test accuracy

被引:12
作者
Branscum, Adam J. [1 ]
Johnson, Wesley O.
Gardner, Ian A.
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Biostat, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Stat, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Dept Epidemiol, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Stat, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Med & Epidemiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Bayesian modeling; prediction; screening tests; sensitivity; specificity; WinBUGS;
D O I
10.1198/108571107X177519
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We developed a Bayesian approach to sample size calculations for cross-sectional studies designed to estimate sensitivity and specificity of one or more diagnostic tests. Sample size calculations can be made for common study designs such as one test in one population, two conditionally independent or dependent tests in <= 2 populations, and three tests in <= 2 populations. We determine a sample size combination that yields high predictive probability, with respect to the future study data, of accurate and precise estimates of sensitivity and specificity. We also consider hypothesis testing for demonstrating the superiority or equivalence of one diagnostic test relative to another. The predictive probability can also be computed when the sample size combination is fixed in advance, thereby providing a "power-like" measure for the future study. The method is straightforward to implement using the S-Plus/R library emBedBUGS together with WinBUGS.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 127
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Adcock CJ, 1997, J ROY STAT SOC D-STA, V46, P261
[2]   A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard [J].
Albert, PS ;
Dodd, LE .
BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (02) :427-435
[3]   Sample size calculations for comparative studies of medical tests for detecting presence of disease [J].
Alonzo, TA ;
Pepe, MS ;
Moskowitz, CS .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (06) :835-852
[4]   Estimating disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard [J].
Black, MA ;
Craig, BA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (18) :2653-2669
[5]   Evaluation of diagnostic tests for the detection of classical swine fever in the field without a gold standard [J].
Bouma, A ;
Stegeman, JA ;
Engel, B ;
de Kluijver, EP ;
Elbers, ARW ;
De Jong, MCM .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2001, 13 (05) :383-388
[6]   Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling [J].
Branscum, AJ ;
Gardner, IA ;
Johnson, WO .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2005, 68 (2-4) :145-163
[7]   Bayesian modeling of animal- and herd-level prevalences [J].
Branscum, AJ ;
Gardner, IA ;
Johnson, WO .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2004, 66 (1-4) :101-112
[8]   A new probability formula for surveys to substantiate freedom from disease [J].
Cameron, AR ;
Baldock, FC .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1998, 34 (01) :1-17
[9]   Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test [J].
Dendukuri, N ;
Rahme, E ;
Bélisle, P ;
Joseph, L .
BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (02) :388-397
[10]   Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests [J].
Dendukuri, N ;
Joseph, L .
BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (01) :158-167