Stakeholder objective preferences in Australian Commonwealth managed fisheries

被引:63
作者
Pascoe, Sean [1 ]
Proctor, Wendy [2 ]
Wilcox, Chris [3 ]
Innes, James [4 ]
Rochester, Wayne [1 ]
Dowling, Natalie [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, Cleveland, Qld 4163, Australia
[2] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[4] Univ Portsmouth, CEMARE, Portsmouth, Hants, England
关键词
Multiple objectives; Fisheries management; Analytic hierarchy process; Stakeholder preferences; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; VECTOR-SPACE FORMULATION; DECISION-MAKING; PROCESS AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2009.02.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fisheries management is increasingly involving a wide range of stakeholders in the decision making process. However, in most fisheries, the set of management objectives are poorly defined, and the implicit importance placed on these objectives may vary considerably both between and within different stakeholder groups. This may lead to conflicts within management advisory groups where members from different stakeholder groups view potential management outcomes substantially differently, and inconsistencies in decision making when changes in stakeholder representation take place. In this paper, the institutional structure of fisheries management in Australia and the roles the different organisations play in shaping fisheries management plans are detailed. An explicit hierarchy of management objectives is developed in collaboration with key managers and policy makers. A large survey of stakeholders involved in Australian Commonwealth fisheries management was undertaken to determine stakeholder preferences relating to these objectives. The results highlight the differences in perspectives regarding the relative importance of the multiple objectives of fisheries management. While on average stakeholder preferences generally correspond with their expected preference set, the results also indicate that there is generally low coherence within stakeholder groups. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 758
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ABARE, 2008, AUSTR FISH STAT 2007
[2]   A commentary on the views of environmental groups on access control in fisheries [J].
Anderson, LG .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 1995, 28 (1-3) :165-188
[3]   Fisheries management and operations research [J].
Arnason, Ragnar .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 193 (03) :741-751
[4]   HOW MUCH POLITICAL COMPROMISE CAN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT STAND - PREMIUMS AND POLITICS IN CLOSED COASTAL FISHERIES [J].
CHATTERTON, L ;
CHATTERTON, B .
MARINE POLICY, 1981, 5 (02) :114-134
[5]   Reconciling sustainability, economic efficiency and equity in fisheries: the one that got away? [J].
Cochrane, Kevern L. .
FISH AND FISHERIES, 2000, 1 (01) :3-21
[6]  
Gerber L. R., 1999, Reviews in Fisheries Science, V7, P23, DOI 10.1080/10641269991319180
[7]   THE AUSTRALIAN OFFSHORE CONSTITUTIONAL SETTLEMENT [J].
HAWARD, M .
MARINE POLICY, 1989, 13 (04) :334-348
[8]   Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives [J].
Hilborn, Ray .
MARINE POLICY, 2007, 31 (02) :153-158
[9]   Performance indicator importance in MPA management using a multi-criteria approach [J].
Himes, Amber H. .
COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 35 (05) :601-618
[10]   Evaluating fisheries management options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [J].
Leung, PS ;
Muraoka, J ;
Nakamoto, ST ;
Pooley, S .
FISHERIES RESEARCH, 1998, 36 (2-3) :171-183