Nutritional Risk Screening in Cancer Patients: The First Step Toward Better Clinical Outcome

被引:75
作者
Reber, Emilie [1 ]
Schonenberger, Katja A. [1 ]
Vasiloglou, Maria F. [2 ]
Stanga, Zeno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inselspital, Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Diabet Endocrinol Nutr Med & Metab, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Artificial Organ ARTORG Ctr Biomed Engn Res, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
cancer; NRS; 2002; malnutrition (MeSH); oncology; nutritional screening; SUBJECTIVE GLOBAL ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT PG-SGA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ESPEN GUIDELINES; ASSESSMENT MNA; MALNUTRITION; TOOL; PREVALENCE; CACHEXIA;
D O I
10.3389/fnut.2021.603936
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Disease-related malnutrition is highly prevalent among cancer patients, with 40-80% suffering from it during the course of their disease. Malnutrition is associated with numerous negative outcomes such as: longer hospital stays, increased morbidity and mortality rates, delayed wound healing, as well as decreased muscle function, autonomy and quality of life. In cancer patients, malnutrition negatively affects treatment tolerance (including anti-cancer drugs, surgery, chemo- and radiotherapy), increases side effects, causes adverse reactions, treatment interruptions, postoperative complications and higher readmission rates. Conversely, anti-cancer treatments are also known to affect body composition and impair nutritional status. Tailoring early nutritional therapy to patients' needs has been shown to prevent, treat and limit the negative consequences of malnutrition and is likely to improve overall prognosis. As the optimisation of treatment outcomes is top priority and evidence for nutritional therapy is growing, it is increasingly recognized as a significant intervention and an autonomous component of multimodal cancer care. The proactive implementation of nutritional screening and assessment is essential for patients suffering from cancer - given the interaction of clinical, metabolic, pharmacological factors with systemic inflammation; and suppressed appetite with accelerated muscle protein catabolism. At the same time, a nutritional care plan must be established, and adequate individualized nutritional intervention started rapidly. Screening tools for nutritional risk should be validated, standardized, non-invasive, quick and easy-to-use in daily clinical practice. Such tools must be able to identify patients who are already malnourished, as well as those at risk for malnutrition, in order to prevent or treat malnutrition and reduce negative outcomes. This review investigates the predictive value of commonly used screening tools, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of their individual components for improving clinical outcomes in oncologic populations. Healthcare professionals' awareness of malnutrition in cancer patients and the pertinence of early nutritional screening must be raised in order to plan the best possible intervention and follow-up during the patients' ordeal with the disease.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) is a valid screening tool in chemotherapy outpatients [J].
Abbott, Jessica ;
Teleni, L. ;
McKavanagh, D. ;
Watson, J. ;
McCarthy, A. L. ;
Isenring, E. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (09) :3883-3887
[2]   An evaluation of three nutritional screening tools in a Portuguese oncology centre [J].
Amaral, T. F. ;
Antunes, A. ;
Cabral, S. ;
Alves, P. ;
Kent-Smith, L. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2008, 21 (06) :575-583
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, A Report by the Malnutrition Advisory Group of the British Association for Patenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN)
[4]   ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition [J].
Arends, J. ;
Baracos, V. ;
Bertz, H. ;
Bozzetti, F. ;
Calder, P. C. ;
Deutz, N. E. P. ;
Erickson, N. ;
Laviano, A. ;
Lisanti, M. P. ;
Lobo, D. N. ;
McMillan, D. C. ;
Muscaritoli, M. ;
Ockenga, J. ;
Pirlich, M. ;
Strasser, F. ;
de van der Schueren, M. ;
Van Gossum, A. ;
Vaupel, P. ;
Weimann, A. .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 36 (05) :1187-1196
[5]   ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients [J].
Arends, Jann ;
Bachmann, Patrick ;
Baracos, Vickie ;
Barthelemy, Nicole ;
Bertz, Hartmut ;
Bozzetti, Federico ;
Fearon, Ken ;
Huetterer, Elisabeth ;
Isenring, Elizabeth ;
Kaasa, Stein ;
Krznaric, Zeljko ;
Laird, Barry ;
Larsson, Maria ;
Laviano, Alessandro ;
Muhlebach, Stefan ;
Muscaritoli, Maurizio ;
Oldervoll, Line ;
Ravasco, Paula ;
Solheim, Tora ;
Strasser, Florian ;
de van der Schueren, Marian ;
Preiser, Jean-Charles .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 36 (01) :11-48
[6]  
Argiles J M, 2005, Eur J Oncol Nurs, V9 Suppl 2, pS39, DOI 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.09.006
[7]   NUTRISCORE: A new nutritional screening tool for oncological outpatients [J].
Arribas, Lorena ;
Hurtos, Laura ;
Jose Sendros, Maria ;
Peiro, Inmaculada ;
Salleras, Neus ;
Fort, Eduard ;
Manuel Sanchez-Migallon, Jose .
NUTRITION, 2017, 33 :297-303
[8]  
ASPEN Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force, 2002, JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, V26, p1SA
[9]   NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT - A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL JUDGMENT AND OBJECTIVE MEASUREMENTS [J].
BAKER, JP ;
DETSKY, AS ;
WESSON, DE ;
WOLMAN, SL ;
STEWART, S ;
WHITEWELL, J ;
LANGER, B ;
JEEJEEBHOY, KN .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 306 (16) :969-972
[10]  
Bargetzi A., 2020, CLIN NUTR