Lessons from a Pandemic: Educating for Complexity, Change, Uncertainty, Vulnerability, and Resilience

被引:54
作者
Talanquer, Vicente [1 ]
Bucat, Robert [2 ]
Tasker, Roy [3 ]
Mahaffy, Peter G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Chem & Biochem, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Mol Sci, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Sci & Hlth, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[4] Kings Univ, Dept Chem, Edmonton, AB T6B 2H3, Canada
关键词
First -Year Undergraduate/General; Second-Year Undergraduate; Curriculum Interdisciplinary; Environmental Chemistry; Problem Solving/Decision Making; Applications of Chemistry; Systems Thinking; Sustainability; MOLECULAR-BASIS; CHEMISTRY; SUSTAINABILITY; THINKING;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00627
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally changed many aspects of our world including the way we teach chemistry. Our emergence from the pandemic provides an opportunity for deep reflection and intentional action about what we teach, and why, as well as how we facilitate student learning. Focusing on foundational postsecondary chemistry courses, we suggest that we cannot simply return to "normal practice but need to design and implement new ways of teaching and learning based on fundamentally reimagined learning outcomes for our courses that equip students for life after the rupture they have experienced. We recommend that new learning objectives should be guided both by an analysis of existing global challenges and the types of understandings and practices needed to confront them, and by research-based frameworks that provide insights into important areas of knowledge, skill, and attitude development. We identify a core set of competencies along three major dimensions (crosscutting reasoning, core understandings, and fundamental practices) that we believe should guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of chemistry curricula, teaching practices, and assessments in foundational courses for science and engineering majors. The proposed framework adopts systems thinking as the underpinning form of reasoning that students should develop to analyze and comprehend complex global systems and phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:2696 / 2700
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas, English
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The next generation science standards
[3]  
Betts R., 2020, CARBON BRIEF
[4]   Chemistry Education Research-From Personal Empiricism to Evidence, Theory, and Informed Practice [J].
Cooper, Melanie M. ;
Stowe, Ryan L. .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2018, 118 (12) :6053-6087
[5]  
Cornog J., 1924, J. Chem. Ed, V1, P5, DOI [10.1021/ed001p5, DOI 10.1021/ED001P5]
[6]  
Fiore S., 2017, Collaborative Problem Solving: Considerations for the National Assessment of Educational Progress
[7]  
Griffin P, 2012, ASSESSMENT AND TEACHING OF 21ST CENTURY SKILLS, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_1
[8]  
IEA, 2020, "Global ev Outlook 2020,"
[9]  
Lemelson, 2020, ENG ONE PLANET DEFIN
[10]   Integrating the Molecular Basis of Sustainability into General Chemistry through Systems Thinking [J].
Mahaffy, Peter G. ;
Matlin, Stephen A. ;
Whalen, J. Marc ;
Holme, Thomas A. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 96 (12) :2730-2741