Registration of acute stroke: validity in the Danish Stroke Registry and the Danish National Registry of Patients

被引:176
作者
Wildenschild, Cathrine [1 ]
Mehnert, Frank [1 ]
Thomsen, Reimar Wernich [1 ]
Iversen, Helle Klingenberg [2 ]
Vestergaard, Karsten [3 ]
Ingeman, Annette [1 ]
Johnsen, Soren Paaske [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Olof Palmes Alle 43-45, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
[2] Glostrup Cty Hosp, Dept Neurol, Glostrup, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aalborg Hosp, Dept Neurol, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
diagnosis; sensitivity; specificity; registries;
D O I
10.2147/CLEP.S50449
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The validity of the registration of patients in stroke-specific registries has seldom been investigated, nor compared with administrative hospital discharge registries. The objective of this study was to examine the validity of the registration of patients in a stroke-specific registry (The Danish Stroke Registry [DSR]) and a hospital discharge registry (The Danish National Patient Registry [DNRP]). Methods: Assuming that all patients with stroke were registered in either the DSR, DNRP or both, we first identified a sample of 75 patients registered with stroke in 2009; 25 patients in the DSR, 25 patients in the DNRP, and 25 patients registered in both data sources. Using the medical record as a gold standard, we then estimated the sensitivity and positive predictive value of a stroke diagnosis in the DSR and the DNRP. Secondly, we reviewed 160 medical records for all potential stroke patients discharged from four major neurologic wards within a 7-day period in 2010, and estimated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the DSR and the DNRP. Results: Using the first approach, we found a sensitivity of 97% (worst/best case scenario 92%-99%) in the DSR and 79% (worst/best case scenario 73%-84%) in the DNRP. The positive predictive value was 90% (worst/best case scenario 72%-98%) in the DSR and 79% (worst/best case scenario 62%-88%) in the DNRP. Using the second approach, we found a sensitivity of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81%-96%) and 58% (95% CI 46%-69%) in the DSR and DNRP, respectively. The negative predictive value was 91% (95% CI 83%-96%) in the DSR and 72% (95% CI 62%-80%) in the DNRP. The specificity and positive predictive value did not differ among the registries. Conclusion: Our data suggest a higher sensitivity in the DSR than the DNRP for acute stroke diagnoses, whereas the positive predictive value was comparable in the two data sources.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[31]   The validation of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register and Causes of Death Register data on stroke diagnoses [J].
Tolonen, Hanna ;
Salomaa, Veikko ;
Torppa, Jorma ;
Sivenius, Juhani ;
Immonen-Raiha, Pirjo ;
Lehtonen, Aapo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION, 2007, 14 (03) :380-385
[32]   The China National Stroke Registry for patients with acute cerebrovascular events: design, rationale, and baseline patient characteristics [J].
Wang, Yongjun ;
Cui, Liying ;
Ji, Xunming ;
Dong, Qiang ;
Zeng, Jinsheng ;
Wang, Yilong ;
Zhou, Yong ;
Zhao, Xingquan ;
Wang, Chunxue ;
Liu, Liping ;
Nguyen-Huynh, Mai N. ;
Johnston, S. Claiborne ;
Wong, Lawrence ;
Li, Hao .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2011, 6 (04) :355-361
[33]  
WHO, 2010, ICD-10 Version