Vicissitudes of a misnomer: Reply to Dalgleish (2005)

被引:8
作者
Chajut, E
Lev, S
Algom, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Psychol, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Open Univ, Dept Psychol, Raanana, Israel
关键词
conflict words; threat words; attention; emotion;
D O I
10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.592
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Stroop effect is psycholo.-y's classic measure gauging the selectivity of attention to individual attributes of complex stimuli. The emotional Stroop effect gauges the influence on behavior of threat and emotional stimuli. The former taps central/executive processes abstracted from particular stimulus contexts, whereas the latter taps automatic processes inextricably linked to particular stimuli in the environment. T. Dalgleish (2005) raised concerns about the data and theory that support the separateness of the 2 effects (D. Algom, E. Chajut, & S. Lev, 2004). The present reply shows that Dalgleish's objections are unwarranted and that the term emotional Stroop effect blurs the deep conceptual divide separating the 2 phenomena.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 595
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect [J].
Algom, D ;
Chajut, E ;
Lev, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (03) :323-338
[2]   IDENTITY PRIMES PRODUCE FACILITATION IN A COLOR NAMING TASK [J].
BURT, JS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 47 (04) :957-1000
[3]   Why do non-color words interfere with color naming? [J].
Burt, JS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2002, 28 (05) :1019-1038
[4]   Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus [J].
Chen, M ;
Bargh, JA .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1999, 25 (02) :215-224
[5]   Putting some feeling into it - The conceptual and empirical relationships between the classic and emotional Stroop tasks: Comment on Algom, Chajut, and Lev (2004) [J].
Dalgleish, T .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (04) :585-591
[6]   The effects of blocked versus random presentation and semantic relatedness of stimulus words on response to a modified Stroop task among social phobics [J].
Holle, C ;
Neely, JH ;
Heimberg, RG .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1997, 21 (06) :681-697
[7]   Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations [J].
Jacoby, LL ;
Lindsay, DS ;
Hessels, S .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (03) :638-644
[8]  
LARSEN RJ, 2005, IN PRESS LEXICAL CHA
[9]   Selection for cognition: Cognitive constraints on visual spatial attention [J].
Logan, GD ;
Zbrodoff, NJ .
VISUAL COGNITION, 1999, 6 (01) :55-81
[10]   THE STROOP TASK - THE GOLD STANDARD OF ATTENTIONAL MEASURES [J].
MACLEOD, CM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1992, 121 (01) :12-14