Research Integrity Practices from the Perspective of Early-Career Researchers

被引:24
作者
Krstic, Snezana B.
机构
[1] PAK 175323, Belgrade
关键词
Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research (RCR); Responsible research and innovation; Early-career researchers; Doctoral training; RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT; RESEARCH MISCONDUCT; SUPERVISORS; SCIENTISTS; STUDENTS; PHD;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-014-9607-z
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Unavailability of published data and studies focused on young researchers in Europe and research integrity issues reveals that clear understanding and stance on this subject within European area is lacking. Our study provides information on attitudes and experiences of European researchers at early career stages (doctoral and postdoctoral level), based on a limited sample of respondents (n = 27). The study provides both quantitative and qualitative results for the examined issues. The data suggest that awareness and interest of the younger researchers surveyed in research integrity issues is high, however, it is often based on self-initiatives, with many of the respondents not having adequate training or any possibility to obtain it. Our attitude survey conducted within the European Council of Doctoral Candidates and Junior Researchers indicates that only 22 % of respondents had an opportunity to obtain relevant training (significantly less than in a study conducted in the U.S.), and that only one third believed that institutions and supervisors regularly paid attention to it. Further, we noted certain differences between disciplines. The study also reveals that many younger researchers felt they faced problems due to the misconduct of their senior colleagues and the existing institutional culture. The results of the study indicate a need for better prevention mechanisms, training and raising awareness activities. Preferably, junior researchers should be given an active role in shaping the integrity culture. It should be noted that the presented results should be considered in the context of the limitations stemming from the small-scale survey. This paper encourages further research activities on research integrity practices to provide stronger evidence on the attitudes and experiences of young researchers in Europe and other parts of the world.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1196
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists [J].
Anderson, Melissa S. ;
Horn, Aaron S. ;
Risbey, Kelly R. ;
Ronning, Emily A. ;
De Vries, Raymond ;
Martinson, Brian C. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (09) :853-860
[3]  
Ates G., 2011, Eurodoc Survey I. The First Eurodoc Survey on Doctoral Candidates in Twelve European Countries.: Descriptive Report
[4]   Research integrity and publication ethics [J].
Beisiegel, Ulrike .
ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2010, 212 (02) :383-385
[5]   Mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct [J].
Bird, SJ .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2001, 7 (04) :455-468
[6]  
Brouneus F., 2014, EUROSCIENTIST
[7]  
Dorey E., 2010, CHEM IND MAGAZINE, P2
[8]  
ESF (European Science Foundation), 2010, FOST RES INT EUR
[9]  
Franzen M, 2007, EMBO REP, V8, P3, DOI 10.1038/sj.embor.7400884
[10]  
Grant B., 2010, SCIENTIST