Short-Term Outcomes of Screening Mammography Using Computer-Aided Detection A Population-Based Study of Medicare Enrollees

被引:54
作者
Fenton, Joshua J.
Xing, Guibo
Elmore, Joann G.
Bang, Heejung
Chen, Steven L.
Lindfors, Karen K.
Baldwin, Laura-Mae
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Healthcare Policy & Res, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
BREAST-CANCER DETECTION; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ASSISTED DETECTION; UNITED-STATES; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; IMPACT; CLAIMS; THERAPY; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Computer-aided detection (CAD) has rapidly diffused into screening mammography practice despite limited and conflicting data on its clinical effect. Objective: To determine associations between CAD use during screening mammography and the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer, invasive cancer stage, and diagnostic testing. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Medicare program. Participants: Women aged 67 to 89 years having screening mammography between 2001 and 2006 in U. S. SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) regions (409 459 mammograms from 163 099 women). Measurements: Incident DCIS and invasive breast cancer within 1 year after mammography, invasive cancer stage, and diagnostic testing within 90 days after screening among women without breast cancer. Results: From 2001 to 2006, CAD prevalence increased from 3.6% to 60.5%. Use of CAD was associated with greater DCIS incidence (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.23]) but no difference in invasive breast cancer incidence (adjusted OR, 1.00 [CI, 0.97 to 1.03]). Among women with invasive cancer, CAD was associated with greater likelihood of stage I to II versus III to IV cancer (adjusted OR, 1.27 [CI, 1.14 to 1.41]). In women without breast cancer, CAD was associated with increased odds of diagnostic mammography (adjusted OR, 1.28 [CI, 1.27 to 1.29]), breast ultrasonography (adjusted OR, 1.07 [CI, 1.06 to 1.09]), and breast biopsy (adjusted OR, 1.10 [CI, 1.08 to 1.12]). Limitation: Short follow-up for cancer stage, potential unmeasured confounding, and uncertain generalizability to younger women. Conclusion: Use of CAD during screening mammography among Medicare enrollees is associated with increased DCIS incidence, the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer at earlier stages, and increased diagnostic testing among women without breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]   Assessing change with longitudinal and clustered binary data [J].
Neuhaus, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 22 :115-128
[32]   How to Discriminate between Computer-Aided and Computer-Hindered Decisions: A Case Study in Mammography [J].
Povyakalo, Andrey A. ;
Alberdi, Eugenio ;
Strigini, Lorenzo ;
Ayton, Peter .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (01) :98-107
[33]   How Widely Is Computer-Aided Detection Used in Screening and Diagnostic Mammography? [J].
Rao, Vijay M. ;
Levin, David C. ;
Parker, Laurence ;
Cavanaugh, Barbara ;
Frangos, Andrea J. ;
Sunshine, Jonathan H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 7 (10) :802-805
[34]   Impact on Breast Cancer Diagnosis in a Multidisciplinary Unit After the Incorporation of Mammography Digitalization and Computer-Aided Detection Systems [J].
Romero, Cristina ;
Almenar, Asuncion ;
Maria Pinto, Jose ;
Varela, Celia ;
Munoz, Enriqueta ;
Botella, Miguel .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (06) :1492-1497
[35]   Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography [J].
Taplin, Stephen H. ;
Rutter, Carolyn M. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (06) :1475-1482
[36]   Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: Two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate [J].
Taylor, Paul ;
Potts, Henry W. W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (06) :798-807
[37]   Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: Development and validation of a new predictive model [J].
Tice, Jeffrey A. ;
Cummings, Steven R. ;
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca ;
Ichikawa, Laura ;
Barlow, William E. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (05) :337-W75
[38]   Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists [J].
van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M. ;
Kessels, Alphons G. H. ;
van Engelshoven, Jos M. A. ;
Boetes, Carla ;
Flobbe, Karin .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 120 (02) :499-506
[39]  
Warren JL, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P3
[40]   Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performances in the United States [J].
Yankaskas, BC ;
Taplin, SH ;
Ichikawa, L ;
Geller, BM ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Ballard-Barbash, R ;
Cutter, GR ;
Barlow, WE .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (02) :363-373