Achieving Conservation Science that Bridges the Knowledge-Action Boundary

被引:366
作者
Cook, Carly N. [1 ,2 ]
Mascia, Michael B. [3 ]
Schwartz, Mark W. [4 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [1 ]
Fuller, Richard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
boundary organizations; boundary science; decision making; environmental management; implementation gap; scientific uncertainty; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; POLICY; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; LANDSCAPE; BIOLOGY; CRISIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12050
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
There are many barriers to using science to inform conservation policy and practice. Conservation scientists wishing to produce management-relevant science must balance this goal with the imperative of demonstrating novelty and rigor in their science. Decision makers seeking to make evidence-based decisions must balance a desire for knowledge with the need to act despite uncertainty. Generating science that will effectively inform management decisions requires that the production of information (the components of knowledge) be salient (relevant and timely), credible (authoritative, believable, and trusted), and legitimate (developed via a process that considers the values and perspectives of all relevant actors) in the eyes of both researchers and decision makers. We perceive 3 key challenges for those hoping to generate conservation science that achieves all 3 of these information characteristics. First, scientific and management audiences can have contrasting perceptions about the salience of research. Second, the pursuit of scientific credibility can come at the cost of salience and legitimacy in the eyes of decision makers, and, third, different actors can have conflicting views about what constitutes legitimate information. We highlight 4 institutional frameworks that can facilitate science that will inform management: boundary organizations (environmental organizations that span the boundary between science and management), research scientists embedded in resource management agencies, formal links between decision makers and scientists at research-focused institutions, and training programs for conservation professionals. Although these are not the only approaches to generating boundary-spanning science, nor are they mutually exclusive, they provide mechanisms for promoting communication, translation, and mediation across the knowledge-action boundary. We believe that despite the challenges, conservation science should strive to be a boundary science, which both advances scientific understanding and contributes to decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 678
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] From Publications to Public Actions: When Conservation Biologists Bridge the Gap between Research and Implementation
    Arlettaz, Raphael
    Schaub, Michael
    Fournier, Jerome
    Reichlin, Thomas S.
    Sierro, Antoine
    Watson, James E. M.
    Braunisch, Veronika
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2010, 60 (10) : 835 - 842
  • [2] How Area Sensitivity in Birds is Studied
    Bayard, Trina S.
    Elphick, Chris S.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 938 - 947
  • [3] Use of a Business Excellence Model to Improve Conservation Programs
    Black, Simon
    Groombridge, Jim
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (06) : 1448 - 1458
  • [4] Randomized intervention analysis for detecting non-random change and management impact: Dragonfly examples
    Bried, Jason T.
    Ervin, Gary N.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2011, 11 (02) : 535 - 539
  • [5] Conservation and Adaptation to Climate Change
    Brooke, Cassandra
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (06) : 1471 - 1476
  • [6] Knowledge systems for sustainable development
    Cash, DW
    Clark, WC
    Alcock, F
    Dickson, NM
    Eckley, N
    Guston, DH
    Jäger, J
    Mitchell, RB
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (14) : 8086 - 8091
  • [7] Health Cyberinfrastructure for Collaborative Use-Inspired Research and Practice
    Chismar, William
    Horan, Thomas A.
    Hesse, Bradford W.
    Feldman, Sue S.
    Shaikh, Abdul R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 40 (05) : S108 - S114
  • [8] Clark T.W., 1994, Endangered Species Recovery: Finding the Lessons, Improving the Process
  • [9] What do conservation biologists publish?
    Fazey, I
    Fischer, J
    Lindenmayer, DB
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 124 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [10] Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments
    Ferraro, PJ
    Pattanayak, SK
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (04): : 482 - 488