Pathways to marriage and cohabitation in Central America

被引:11
作者
Grace, Kathryn [1 ]
Sweeney, Stuart [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Geog, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Geog, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Inst Social Behav & Econ Res, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
LATIN-AMERICA; COHABITING UNIONS; CONTRACEPTIVE USE; FERTILITY; FAMILY; RISK; CHILDBEARING; TABLES; DISSOLUTION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.6
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND The notion that increasing prevalence of cohabitation relative to marriage, and increasing age at first marriage are part of a broader shift in societal norms - a second demographic transition - is now well supported by studies focused on US and European populations. Recent research points to the similarly high prevalence of cohabitation in Latin America as perhaps signaling the diffusion of modern ideals and norms about union formation. In Central America this is unlikely to be the case given the long history and enduring acceptance of cohabitation that is unrelated to modern ideals. While there are studies that have documented this history and current prevalence, there is no research examining the intersecting life course pathways from adolescence through early adulthood that lead to marriage or cohabitation. This is not surprising given that available data for Central American countries are not ideally suited to studying the process. METHODS We use retrospective questions from large, nationally representative Central American surveys (Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua) to establish the timing of marriage or cohabitation and events that are closely tied to union formation. We utilize additive causespecific hazard models, and predicted transition probabilities based on selected covariate pathways, to study the competing risks of exiting from the status of never in union. RESULTS Our results identify sexual activity and pregnancy as the primary drivers of union formation and indicate that education serves as a protective factor against union formation. We also find distinct differences among countries and a strong indication that cohabitations are less stable unions.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 226
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Marriage and Cohabitation Outcomes After Pregnancy Loss [J].
Gold, Katherine J. ;
Sen, Ananda ;
Hayward, Rodney A. .
PEDIATRICS, 2010, 125 (05) :E1202-E1207
[22]   Pooling of Wealth in Marriage: The Role of Premarital Cohabitation [J].
Vitali, Agnese ;
Fraboni, Romina .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POPULATION-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE DEMOGRAPHIE, 2022, 38 (04) :721-754
[23]   Reassessing Differences in Work and Income in Cohabitation and Marriage [J].
Kuperberg, Arielle .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2012, 74 (04) :688-707
[24]   Education and transition from cohabitation to marriage in Lithuania [J].
Maslauskaite, Ausra ;
Baublyte, Mare .
HISTORY OF THE FAMILY, 2015, 20 (04) :563-578
[25]   Marriage and Cohabitation in South Africa: An Enriching Explanation? [J].
Moore, Elena ;
Govender, Rajen .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE FAMILY STUDIES, 2013, 44 (05) :623-+
[26]   Cohabitation, marriage and relationships with 'parents-in-law' [J].
Artis, Julie E. ;
Martinez, Martha A. .
FAMILIES RELATIONSHIPS AND SOCIETIES, 2016, 5 (01) :3-22
[27]   Mental Well-Being Differences in Cohabitation and Marriage: The Role of Childhood Selection [J].
Perelli-Harris, Brienna ;
Styrc, Marta .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2018, 80 (01) :239-255
[28]   Moral Scrutiny, Marriage Inequality: Cohabitation in Bangkok, Thailand [J].
Esara, Pilapa .
ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2012, 13 (03) :211-227
[29]   Marriage, Cohabitation, and Crime: Differentiating Associations by Partnership Stage [J].
Gottlieb, Aaron ;
Sugie, Naomi F. .
JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2019, 36 (03) :503-531
[30]   Investments in Marriage and Cohabitation: The Role of Legal and Interpersonal Commitment [J].
Poortman, Anne-Rigt ;
Mills, Melinda .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2012, 74 (02) :357-376