Short communication: Genetic lag represents commercial herd genetic merit more accurately than the 4-path selection model

被引:7
作者
Dechow, C. D. [1 ]
Rogers, G. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Geno Global Ltd, N-2326 Hamar, Norway
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
genetic progress; genetic lag; dairy cattle; DAIRY-CATTLE; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2017-13571
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Expectation of genetic merit in commercial dairy herds is routinely estimated using a 4-path genetic selection model that was derived for a closed population, but commercial herds using artificial insemination sires are not closed. The 4-path model also predicts a higher rate of genetic progress in elite herds that provide artificial insemination sires than in commercial herds that use such sires, which counters other theoretical assumptions and observations of realized genetic responses. The aim of this work is to clarify whether genetic merit in commercial herds is more accurately reflected under the assumptions of the 4-path genetic response formula or by a genetic lag formula. We demonstrate by tracing the transmission of genetic merit from parents to offspring that the rate of genetic progress in commercial dairy farms is expected to be the same as that in the genetic nucleus. The lag in genetic merit between the nucleus and commercial farms is a function of sire and dam generation interval, the rate of genetic progress in elite artificial insemination herds, and genetic merit of sires and dams. To predict how strategies such as the use of young versus daughter-proven sires, culling heifers following genomic testing, or selective use of sexed semen will alter genetic merit in commercial herds, genetic merit expectations for commercial herds should be modeled using genetic lag expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:4312 / 4316
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   DISSEMINATION OF GENETIC IMPROVEMENT THROUGH A LIVESTOCK INDUSTRY [J].
BICHARD, M .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1971, 13 (AUG) :401-&
[2]  
CDCB (Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding), 2017, TREND DAUGHT PREG RA
[3]  
CDCB (Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding), 2017, TREND PROT HV HOLST
[4]  
Falconer D.S., 1996, Quantitative Genetics, V4th
[5]   Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection [J].
Garcia-Ruiz, Adriana ;
Cole, John B. ;
VanRaden, Paul M. ;
Wiggans, George R. ;
Ruiz-Lopez, Felipe J. ;
Van Tassell, Curtis P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (28) :E3995-E4004
[6]   Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations [J].
Gorjanc, Gregor ;
Bijma, Piter ;
Hickey, John M. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2015, 47
[7]   INCREASED RATES OF GENETIC CHANGE IN DAIRY-CATTLE BY EMBRYO TRANSFER AND SPLITTING [J].
NICHOLAS, FW ;
SMITH, C .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1983, 36 (JUN) :341-353
[8]   ESTIMATION OF GENETIC GAIN IN MILK YIELD BY SELECTION IN A CLOSED HERD OF DAIRY CATTLE [J].
RENDEL, JM ;
ROBERTSON, A .
JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 1950, 50 (01) :1-8
[9]   Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle [J].
Schaeffer, L. R. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2006, 123 (04) :218-223
[10]   Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls [J].
VanRaden, P. M. ;
Van Tassell, C. P. ;
Wiggans, G. R. ;
Sonstegard, T. S. ;
Schnabel, R. D. ;
Taylor, J. F. ;
Schenkel, F. S. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (01) :16-24