Complete Revascularization in Patients With STEMI and Multi-Vessel Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:5
作者
Al-Abdouh, Ahmad [1 ]
Barbarawi, Mahmoud [2 ]
Bizanti, Anas [1 ]
Abudaya, Ibrahim [1 ]
Upadhrasta, Sireesha [1 ]
Elias, Hadi [3 ]
Zhao, Di [4 ]
Savji, Nazir [5 ]
Lakshman, Harini [2 ]
Hasan, Rani [5 ]
Michos, Erin D. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] St Agnes Hosp, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21229 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Med, Hurley Med Ctr, Flint, MI USA
[3] Geisenger Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Mechanicsville, PA USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Ciccarone Ctr Prevent Cardiovasc Dis, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Complete; Culprit; Revascularization; And STEMI; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; MULTIVESSEL DISEASE; ONLY REVASCULARIZATION; ANGIOPLASTY; CULPRIT; PLAQUES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2020.01.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, efficacy of complete vs culprit only revascularization in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease remains unclear. Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, and Cochrane library. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, stroke, major bleeding, and contrast induced nephropathy. Estimates were calculated as random effects hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Twelve trials with 7592 patients were included. There was a significantly lower risk of MACE [HR 0.61; 95% CI (0.43-0.60); p = 0.0009; I-2 = 72%], cardiovascular mortality [HR 0.74; 95% CI (0.56-0.99); p = 0.04; I-2 = 2%], and repeat revascularization [HR 0.43; 95% CI (0.31-0.59); p < 0.00001; I-2 = 67%] in patients treated with complete compared with culprit-only revascularization. There was no statistically significant difference in MI [HR 0.77; 95% CI (0.52-1.12); p = 0.17; I-2 = 49%], all-cause mortality [HR 0.86; 95% CI (0.65-1.13); p = 0.28; I-2 = 14%], heart failure [HR 0.82 95% CI (0.51-1.32); p = 0.42; I-2 = 26%], major bleeding [HR 1.07; 95% CI (0.66-1.75); p = 0.78; I-2 = 25%], stroke [HR 0.67; 95% CI (0.24-1.89); p = 0.45; I-2 = 54%], or contrast induced nephropathy, although higher contrast volumes were used in the complete revascularization group [HR 1.22; 95% CI (0.78-1.92); p = 0.39; I-2 = 0%]. Conclusion: Complete revascularization was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE, cardiovascular mortality, and repeat revascularization compared with culprit-only revascularization. These results suggest complete revascularization with PCI following STEMI and multivessel disease should be considered. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 691
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Resolving the paradox of randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing multi-vessel angioplasty and culprit only angioplasty at the time of STEMI [J].
Ahmad, Yousif ;
Cook, Christopher ;
Shun-Shin, Matthew ;
Balu, Ashwin ;
Keene, Daniel ;
Nijjer, Sukhjinder ;
Petraco, Ricardo ;
Baker, Christopher S. ;
Malik, Iqbal S. ;
Bellamy, Michael F. ;
Sethi, Amarjit ;
Mikhail, Ghada W. ;
Al-Bustami, Mahmud ;
Khan, Masood ;
Kaprielian, Raffi ;
Foale, Rodney A. ;
Mayet, Jamil ;
Davies, Justin E. ;
Francis, Darrel P. ;
Sen, Sayan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 222 :1-8
[2]   Multivessel Intervention During Primary Angioplasty Too Greedy? [J].
Alfonso, Fernando .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (01) :32-34
[3]   Extensive development of vulnerable plaques as a pan-coronary process in patients with myocardial infarction: An angioscopic study [J].
Asakura, M ;
Ueda, Y ;
Yamaguchi, O ;
Adachi, T ;
Hirayama, A ;
Hori, M ;
Kodama, K .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (05) :1284-1288
[4]  
Bogaty P, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V382, P1568, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc2000278, 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775]
[5]   Prevalence, Predictors, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Non-Infarct Artery Intervention During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry) [J].
Cavender, Matthew A. ;
Milford-Beland, Sarah ;
Roe, Matthew T. ;
Peterson, Eric D. ;
Weintraub, William S. ;
Rao, Sunil V. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (04) :507-513
[6]  
DAVIES MJ, 1985, BRIT HEART J, V53, P363
[7]  
Di Mario Carlo, 2004, Int J Cardiovasc Intervent, V6, P128
[8]   Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Engstrom, Thomas ;
Kelbaek, Henning ;
Helqvist, Steffen ;
Hofsten, Dan Eik ;
Klovgaard, Lene ;
Holmvang, Lene ;
Jorgensen, Erik ;
Pedersen, Frants ;
Saunamaki, Kari ;
Clemmensen, Peter ;
De Backer, Ole ;
Ravkilde, Jan ;
Tilsted, Hans-Henrik ;
Villadsen, Anton Boel ;
Aaroe, Jens ;
Jensen, Svend Eggert ;
Raungaard, Bent ;
Kober, Lars .
LANCET, 2015, 386 (9994) :665-671
[9]  
Loureiro RE, 2014, EUR HEART J, V35, P477
[10]   CORONARY-THROMBOSIS - PATHOGENESIS AND CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS [J].
FALK, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1991, 68 (07) :B28-B35