A two-stage model of adaptable product platform for engineering-to-order configuration design

被引:44
作者
Levandowski, Christoffer Erik [1 ]
Jiao, Jianxin Roger [2 ]
Johannesson, Hans [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers, Prod & Prod Dev, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] MARC 262, GW Woodruff Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
multilevel configuration; adaptable design; engineering-to-order; design bandwidth; product platforms; FAMILY DESIGN; LIFE-CYCLE; REUSE; MANAGEMENT; ENABLERS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/09544828.2015.1021305
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Product platforms are used to enable mass customisation to serve a large number of different market segments. The products are configured-to-order, meaning they are compiled using a variety of pre-developed building blocks. However, the building blocks that make up a traditional platform can only serve customer requirements that are known. Engineering-to-order (ETO) development serves companies where customer requirements vary frequently. Here, designs are tailored to fit specific customer requirements upon request, an approach which is time consuming if serving a large number of different customers. This paper presents an approach for ETO configuration design. It comprises a two-stage model that enables design reuse while simultaneously maintaining flexibility to manage changes in customer requirements. The proposed artefact model is configured modularly to progress the design work and to create an architecture to work with, and scalable flexibility is maintained until the customer requirements are considered stable enough to optimise the final design. An illustrative case shows the approach's feasibility to a two-stage configuration of a rear frame of a jet engine. While using overall design considerations to select modules, trade-off curves are used for final scalable configuration. A change in customer requirements is accommodated by scalable flexibility, thereby creating an adaptable product platform.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 235
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Understanding Competencies in Platform-Based Product Development: Antecedents and Outcomes [J].
Chai, Kah-Hin ;
Wang, Qi ;
Song, Michael ;
Halman, Johannes I. M. ;
Brombacher, Aarnout C. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 29 (03) :452-472
[2]  
Claesson A., 2006, CONFIGURABLE COMPONE
[3]   Joint optimization of product family configuration and scaling design by Stackelberg game [J].
Du, Gang ;
Jiao, Roger J. ;
Chen, Mo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 232 (02) :330-341
[4]  
Erixon G., 1998, MODULAR FUNCTION DEP
[5]   Product modularity: definitions and benefits [J].
Gershenson, JK ;
Prasad, GJ ;
Zhang, Y .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2003, 14 (03) :295-313
[6]   Adaptable design [J].
Gu, P ;
Hashemian, M ;
Nee, AYC .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 53 (02) :539-557
[7]   Product modularization for life cycle engineering [J].
Gu, P ;
Sosale, S .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 1999, 15 (05) :387-401
[8]   Agile manufacturing: enablers and an implementation framework [J].
Gunasekaran, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1998, 36 (05) :1223-1247
[9]   The potential of layout platforms for modular complex products and systems [J].
Hofer, AP ;
Halman, JIM .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2005, 16 (02) :237-258
[10]   Current practices of engineering change management in UK manufacturing industries [J].
Huang, GQ ;
Mak, KL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 1999, 19 (01) :21-37