Gender Dichotomization at the Level of Ingroup Identity: What It Is, and Why Men Use It More Than Women

被引:91
作者
Bosson, Jennifer K. [1 ]
Michniewicz, Kenneth S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Psychol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
ingroup identity; gender dichotomization; precarious manhood; male role norms; SOCIAL IDENTITY; IN-GROUP; INTERGROUP DISCRIMINATION; SELF-CATEGORIZATION; PRECARIOUS MANHOOD; MASCULINITY; STEREOTYPES; PERCEPTIONS; UNCERTAINTY; DOMINANCE;
D O I
10.1037/a0033126
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In 5 studies (N = 756), we show that men's relative to women's gender ingroup identities are characterized by greater levels of gender dichotomization, a tendency to distance masculine from feminine traits. We demonstrate further that men's gender dichotomization is motivated, in part, by a need to eschew femininity from their ingroup identity to bolster a precarious gender status. Studies 1-3 establish and replicate the basic effect, and rule out alternative explanations (positivity, projection, status striving) for men's tendency to dichotomize more than women. Studies 4 and 5 demonstrate the motivated nature of gender dichotomization by establishing that men, but not women, dichotomize more strenuously when reminded of the precariousness of their gender status, and report stronger motivation to restore their gender status upon learning that their ingroup is becoming less dichotomized. Across 3 studies, strength of identification with their gender group moderates men's dichotomization tendencies. Discussion considers the implications of these findings for understanding the precarious nature of manhood and identifies practical applications of gender dichotomization in the interpersonal realm.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 442
页数:18
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do [J].
Alicke, Mark D. ;
Sedikides, Constantine .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 20 :1-48
[2]   Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates [J].
Ames, DR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 87 (05) :573-585
[3]  
Ashmore RichardD., 1986, The Social Psychology of Female-Male Relations: A Critical Analysis of Central Concepts, P69
[4]   GENDER SCHEMA THEORY - A COGNITIVE ACCOUNT OF SEX TYPING [J].
BEM, SL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1981, 88 (04) :354-364
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY [J].
BEM, SL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 42 (02) :155-162
[6]   GENDER STEREOTYPES AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MASCULINITY AND FEMININITY - A DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS [J].
BIERNAT, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (03) :351-365
[7]   Selective self-stereotyping [J].
Biernat, M ;
Vescio, TK ;
Green, ML .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (06) :1194-1209
[8]   Gender role violations and identity misclassification: The roles of audience and actor variables [J].
Bosson, Jennifer K. ;
Taylor, Jenel N. ;
Prewitt-Freilino, Jennifer L. .
SEX ROLES, 2006, 55 (1-2) :13-24
[9]   Precarious Manhood and Its Links to Action and Aggression [J].
Bosson, Jennifer K. ;
Vandello, Joseph A. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (02) :82-86
[10]   Precarious Manhood and Displays of Physical Aggression [J].
Bosson, Jennifer K. ;
Vandello, Joseph A. ;
Burnaford, Rochelle M. ;
Weaver, Jonathan R. ;
Wasti, S. Arzu .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2009, 35 (05) :623-634